Talk:Pepijn van Erp

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pepijn van Erp article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Skepticism Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Netherlands

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles

Notability

I am not convinced that the article content and the coverage in the independent sources referenced in the article are establishing Van Erp's notability according to Wikipedia:Notability (people). – Editør (talk) 20:58, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am concerned also about this. It seems that the article was written all by one person only. I think it may meet some very limited guidelines, but not all of them, especially the ones that relates to advertising. For a blogger it is big advertisement to have a page in Wikipedia English and one in Wikipedia in Dutch. In addition, the sources in English are mainly his own website and his blog, while the external references are in Dutch language only and I found that not very helpful. Is there any requirement on this regard? (Editorialeffort (talk) 17:48, 8 March 2017 (UTC)) Editorialeffort[reply]

Just to be more specific and fair: 7 references are from the same "Skeptic in the Pub" articles , 7 are in Dutch, one is a Facebook entry, one is a short biography in Dutch about Pepijn van Erp, it seems a blog, but i do not read Dutch, 2 references are from his website and the External links are his personal website and few entries in a blog by Pepijn van Erp himself writing about his entries in his personal website. (Editorialeffort (talk) 20:44, 8 March 2017 (UTC))Editorialeffort[reply]

Is there a reason this page is still on Wikipedia? It does not meet Wikipedia:Notability (people) and Wikipedia is giving free advertising to his blog. Editorialeffort (talk) 19:44, 5 August 2017 (UTC)(talk) it is clearly against Wikipedia rules of notability to have a page on a person such as Pepijn van Erp who has no credentials and no education, except the attempt to promote his blog, full of wrong information, insults, defamation. For the content of his blog he has been sued in Europe and in USA. Wikipedia is enabling personal issues to become prominent....and that is wrong and free advertisement — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joseph9871 (talk • contribs) 21:02, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Joseph9871: If you can show that he fails our criteria, start an WP:AfD. His lack of whatever is irrelevant to notability. Doug Weller talk 21:28, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]