Talk:Pavithrotsavam

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hinduism

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No consensus to move. MikeLynch (talk) 04:29, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pavithrotsavam → Pavitrotsavam – This word is formed from sanskrit words Pavitra (holy) and utsava (festival) and Pavitrotsavam is more appropriate and easily understood rather than Pavithrotsavam. Also पवित्रोत्सवं is transliterated as Pavitrotsavam Nagarjuna198 (talk) 09:06, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Nagarjuna198 (talk) 03:26, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: No source has been provided. This editor has a tendency to do original research and making changes based on own knowledge. The rationale above does not look too bad, but, source required. In addition, it (i.e. "th") might be local variation of the spelling too.Tito☸Dutta 09:26, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose [1] Official temple site uses Pavithrotsavam. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 12:54, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: Per Redtigerxyz. Tito☸Dutta 13:05, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.