Talk:Parinacota (volcano)

Parinacota (volcano) has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: February 9, 2018. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Volcanoes High‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mountains Mid‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

South America: Bolivia Low‑importance

	Latin America portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to South America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject South AmericaTemplate:WikiProject South AmericaSouth America
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Bolivia (assessed as Low-importance).

Geography Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

Chile

	Chile portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chile, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chile on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChileWikipedia:WikiProject ChileTemplate:WikiProject ChileChile
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by when more than 3 sections are present.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Parinacota (volcano)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs) 11:53, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 11:53, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll copyedit as I go through; please revert as needed. There are some dead links: [1], [2], [3], and [4].

Fixed them and rewrote some sentences as an aside. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:53, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lots of duplicate links; not an issue for GA -- just FYI.

Removed them. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:53, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

where most of the edifice is located: "edifice" is not the right word; it means a structure built by humans. There are several other instances of the word later in the article; is this perhaps a piece of technical vocabulary? It reads very oddly to me. However, if it's standard usage in geology, don't change it.

Yes, "edifice" is a technical term for such things. I think "mountain" may be the best layman term - "volcano" would be duplicative. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:53, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lava flows are fresh: "fresh" seems like an odd word to use of a dormant volcano. Does this just mean that it's not yet significantly eroded?

Yes. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:53, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

which reach dimensions of 4 by 2 kilometres (2.5 mi × 1.2 mi) over horizontal distance: I think this could be cut to "which are 4 by 2 kilometres".

So done, a word may be missing however. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:53, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'd suggest adding a sentence to the lead about the possible dates at which it most recently erupted.

There is already the latest about 200 years ago., unless you want to specify. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:53, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Periglacial landscapes are frequent in the area; they include plantation surfaces,: what does "plantation surface" mean?

Specified. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:53, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

with the 0 °C (32 °F) isotherm hovering between 4,800–4,900 °C (8,670–8,850 °F) elevation: presumably this should be feet, not degrees.

Corrected unit. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:53, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

These are all minor points; I'll promote the article once they're resolved. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 11:05, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Mike Christie: Got this done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:53, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fixes look good. Sorry, just realized I hadn't posted some notes on the sources and footnotes:

You have "p." or "pp." where it should be the reverse for footnotes 13, 56, 58, 60, 62, 85, 105, 111, 118, and 132. These are all consistently of the form "p. 83,84", but I think it's standard to make those "pp.".
The two Ginibre et al. sources in the source list are out of sequence; my understanding is that the sort order is determined by authors first, and by date only after the authors are sorted.

Neither of these is an issue for GA so I'm going to go ahead and promote anyway. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 12:00, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I found the source issues with this script, which you may be interested in. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 12:03, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Search terms

"parinacota" OR "Parina Quta" OR "Parinaquta" AND "volcan" and "parinacota" OR "Parina Quta" OR "Parinaquta" AND volcano -"volcan". Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:01, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear source

This source comes from a broken paper, but may be useful. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:22, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]