Talk:Parasol Unit Foundation for Contemporary Art

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Contemporary Art, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Contemporary ArtWikipedia:WikiProject Contemporary ArtTemplate:WikiProject Contemporary ArtContemporary Art articles

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Request

{{Request edit}} Please review and rewrite from a NPOV or delete Umbrellaki (talk) 09:24, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you've been editing the article yourself or a while now. Is there a reason you made the edit request--do you have any sort of WP:COI that you thought might prevent you from editing neutrally?

I've made a few changes myself; after your recent edits and those of others, do you still believe the article is not neutral and/or not-notable? Personally, I'm inclined to take off the tags now, but if there are specific parts that still concern you, please post them here. Qwyrxian (talk) 06:18, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help. I was employed by the organisation previously so yes have a COI but have made a big effort to make this page more neutral. All the wikipedians I've spoken to seem to agree it is notable and neutral now so if tags could be removed that would be great. What do you think? I have asked someone at the organisation for sources for the section on funding which has been tagged. Umbrellaki (talk) 23:04, 15 January 2011 (UTC)Umbrellaki[reply]

I believe that, while the article is not ideal yet, it has improved enough to have the tags removed (except for the funding section noref tag). I'm going to remove them; if you or anyone else has a reason why they should return, please comment here.

Also, for now, since you have an admitted COI, I recommend that for now, if you want to make any significant changes (i.e., more than basic grammar and spelling), you post them to this talk page instead of making them directly. I've got this page on my watchlist now, so I will be happy to help when I can. Qwyrxian (talk) 02:41, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Advertising

This seems to be little more than an advert for the gallery with a long list of exhibitions. Theroadislong (talk) 17:02, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Parasol unit image 7.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:52, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]