Talk:Paraná

On 16 November 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to Paraná (disambiguation). The result of the discussion was not moved.

Requested move 16 November 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Per discussion below. Best, (closed by non-admin page mover) Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 01:01, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Paraná → Paraná (disambiguation)
Paraná (state) → Paraná

– There are precedents that would demonstrate then when the most popular/well known article also has other articles with the same or similar name, the disambiguation is X (disambiguation) and the popular article stays as its name. See Calgary and Calgary (disambiguation), Edmonton and Edmonton (disambiguation), Oaxaca and Oaxaca (disambiguation) Qwexcxewq (talk) 00:40, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note - Paraná (state) → Paraná was originally opened as a separate move request with an identical rationale. As the two discussions are dependent on each other, I've merged them together and converted the other discussion to a move notice. estar8806 (talk) ★ 02:55, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment No opinion on the primary topic grab, but I'll note that the dabpage should be at Parana, since it covers topics named "Paraná" and "Paranã". 162 etc. (talk) 17:11, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Move Paraná → Parana (disambiguation) or Parana. Oppose 2nd. Insufficient disambiguation with Paranã.Theparties (talk) 00:01, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, no PRIMARY.--Ortizesp (talk) 05:37, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure I understand the argument in the proposal - why are the examples of Calgary, Edmonton and Oaxaca similar to this, exactly? Per WP:DPT, if we just look at WikiNav for Parana, it's clear that the reader interest is not in a single topic. If a primary topic is to be decided on, we should also discuss long-term significance, and I'm not sure how we could claim that for state given the river, etc. (Oppose) --Joy (talk) 14:15, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
JFTR page views for the most popular topics indicate a slowly growing trend for the state, but generally the readership there does not exceed the readership of other topics. What we can do is try to apply MOS:DABCOMMON. --Joy (talk) 09:28, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. No primary topic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:57, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.