Talk:Panvel railway station
Appearance
Panvel railway station received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Panvel was copied or moved into Panvel railway station with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:40, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
Suggestion to add the Architect of the project
[edit]The Panvel railway station was build by the architect named Mr. Shashi Prabhu Megh at Shashi Prabhu and Associates (talk) 04:57, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Megh at Shashi Prabhu and Associates Please provide reliable and independent secondary sources that establish why this is due — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 08:44, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- [1]https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/maharashtra-transport-department-to-redevelop-13-bus-depots/articleshow/56427008.cms
- [2]https://www.shashiprabhu.com/timeline.html#:~:text=Panvel%20Railway%20Station%20%2D%202007
- @DaxServer Megh at Shashi Prabhu and Associates (talk) 08:59, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- The TOI source is about the bus depot. I don't see why it is encyclopaedic to mention Shashi Prabhu — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 09:04, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- The bus depot is going to be made a joining the railway station and is also a part of the renovation project that we've received for our previously built railway station.
- Can you please mention the architect section in the article page? Megh at Shashi Prabhu and Associates (talk) 09:33, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry no. I don't see why it is encyclopaedic — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 10:32, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- @DaxServer, we're just trying here to add the architect information for the projects that we've done.
- Can you please provide us a way to add this data to the article pages? Megh at Shashi Prabhu and Associates (talk) 10:40, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- I don't think you understand the purpose of Wikipedia. I'd ask you to focus your efforts elsewhere. Goodbye! — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 10:54, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry I don't get your point. We're just trying here to spread the awareness about our projects itself. I don't see a point about why we cannot mention our own name for the projects we've done.
- Can you please provide us a way to add this data to the article pages or is there anyone else I can be speaking with? Megh at Shashi Prabhu and Associates (talk) 10:59, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
spread awareness about our projects
is the textbook definition of WP:PROMO. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:10, 6 June 2023 (UTC)- But why does Wikipedia allow a few of our project mention our name but doesn't allow for others? How does mentioning the architect name in the projects translate into WP:PROMO Megh at Shashi Prabhu and Associates (talk) 11:54, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- Your purpose is counter to Wikipedia's purpose. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:07, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- Can you please explain why some of our projects include our name in the architect field but we're not allowed to mention our name itself in some of the projects that we've done? Megh at Shashi Prabhu and Associates (talk) 09:12, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
- WP:WHATABOUT is not an acceptable line of questioning. If anything, the name should be removed from those other places. - UtherSRG (talk) 10:42, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
- Can you please explain why some of our projects include our name in the architect field but we're not allowed to mention our name itself in some of the projects that we've done? Megh at Shashi Prabhu and Associates (talk) 09:12, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
- Your purpose is counter to Wikipedia's purpose. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:07, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- But why does Wikipedia allow a few of our project mention our name but doesn't allow for others? How does mentioning the architect name in the projects translate into WP:PROMO Megh at Shashi Prabhu and Associates (talk) 11:54, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- I don't think you understand the purpose of Wikipedia. I'd ask you to focus your efforts elsewhere. Goodbye! — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 10:54, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry no. I don't see why it is encyclopaedic — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 10:32, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- The TOI source is about the bus depot. I don't see why it is encyclopaedic to mention Shashi Prabhu — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 09:04, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Categories:
- Old requests for peer review
- C-Class India articles
- Low-importance India articles
- C-Class India articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject India articles
- C-Class rail transport articles
- Low-importance rail transport articles
- C-Class Stations articles
- WikiProject Stations articles
- C-Class Indian railways articles
- Unknown-importance Indian railways articles
- WikiProject Indian railways articles
- All WikiProject Trains pages