This article is within the scope of WikiProject Freedom of speech, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freedom of speech on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Freedom of speechWikipedia:WikiProject Freedom of speechTemplate:WikiProject Freedom of speechFreedom of speech
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon
A fact from Pacifica Forum appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 May 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
I just deleted a section talking about how the Oregon Commentator - one of the publications to break the Pacifica Forum story - has ties to Nazi groups. As someone who has worked in the journalism community of the University of Oregon for years now, I know this to be blatantly false, as the Oregon Commentator, though not exactly a shining beacon of journalistic integrity, is a libertarian magazine with an active hatred of Nazism. I'm also familiar with its founding, and it was not founded by Nazis.
Additionally, the source the author cited was broken, and no article on the Pacifica Forum controversy found on the Register-Guard website supports the author's claim. It seems very clear that this section was added in an attempt to either smear the Oregon Commentator, discredit their critique of the Pacifica Forum, or both. OrdoHermetica (talk) 04:12, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I reverted the article back to past when that was added. Sorry it was in there for so long. I'm no fan of the Commentator (I'm an Emerald alum) but they're not Nazis. Valfontis (talk) 21:00, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Someone reverted the removal of this before by claiming it was sourced, but a quick look at the page history shows the info was shoehorned into the previous ref. (Note even if the link is broken the ref is still OK for what it originally backed up. Sources don't have to be online. And I verified the refs myself several years ago. Valfontis (talk) 21:12, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
