Talk:Paccar

Trucks High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trucks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of trucks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TrucksWikipedia:WikiProject TrucksTemplate:WikiProject TrucksTrucks
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

United States: Washington / Seattle Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington - Seattle.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

WebSolEditor (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection.

Removal of claim about parent company

I removed a claim introduced with wrong syntax by an anonymous user (see User talk:116.118.35.102) in the edit https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Paccar&diff=604255689&oldid=604197525 and later "corrected" (seemingly in good faith) by User:Seqqis, so that it became visible. While it is not financially impossible that the conglomerate Investor AB, with a market cap of more than USD 26 bn, would buy half of Paccar (with a total market cap less than USD 21 bn), there is no evidence at all that this might be the actual case, and obviously, both companies would be required to disclose such a transaction.

The same anonymous user made a corresponding edit to Investor AB—apparently so that the claim would seem correct to someone who does not bother checking sources outside of Wikipedia. Somewhat creepy and demonstrates the importance of not believing claims that lack references…--OttoG (talk) 15:44, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@OttoG

One could say that Paccar is the only US truck manufacturer which is not a subsidiary of some foreign (I mean: not USA) company. Others are subsidiaries either of Daimler Trucks or Traton, the truck division of the VW group. Is the a Wikipedia-article listing the various truck manufacturers: Daimler Trucks, Traton (VW Group), Iveco, Paccar, who else? L.Willms (talk) 21:10, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Paccar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120217164112/http://www.historyink.org/index.cfm?DisplayPage=output.cfm&file_id=3194 to http://www.historyink.org/index.cfm?DisplayPage=output.cfm&file_id=3194

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:50, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on Paccar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:32, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion for change

Sorry, I don't know where else to present this query. I didn't want to edit the article unilaterally...

Is this an article on Wikipedia or is it the PACCAR company website? the whole thing sounds like an advertisement. Not objective in the least. Clearly written by someone from public relations. LookAtDisFUKnGuy (talk) 03:01, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article had to be reverted to an old version recently to remove copyright violations (ironically, partially from the PACCAR website). So there are likely some flaws in the article at present. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 13:56, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]