Talk:Ouachita Mountains

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ouachita Mountains article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Geography Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

Oklahoma Mid‑importance

	Oklahoma portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oklahoma, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oklahoma on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OklahomaWikipedia:WikiProject OklahomaTemplate:WikiProject OklahomaOklahoma
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mountains Low‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Arkansas Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Arkansas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Arkansas.

Proposed removal of link to Marathon Uplift

The page which may have formerly existed, "Marathon uplift", referring to a geological formation in Western Texas, has been redirected to a page which has no connection to the content of the Ouachita Mountains, and I therefore propose the link be removed until a proper page for the Marathon Uplift is created. yyNoel Stoutenburg 0754 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Only major mountainous region?

What about the Black Hills? They're a major mountainous region, aren't they? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.188.103.65 (talk) 04:38, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, they are. In fact the Black Hills' highest peak is taller than any in the Appalachian chain, so the claim here is not accurate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.181.214.17 (talk) 16:38, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

California Fan Palm/Balcones Fault

This article states that the California Fan Palm is native to the Ouachita Mountains and that the Balcones Fault cuts through the mountains. There is no way those statements are true, as the California Fan Palm is native to a small region of the Sonoran and Mojave Deserts. Furthermore, the Balcones Fault is contained entirely within the state of Texas, and extends from Waco to Del Rio. It does not come anywhere near the Ouachita Mountains. I think the author may have misinterpreted how the Ouachita Mountains function as a dividing line of plant families, not individual species. Regardless, these factual errors must be corrected. --TDogg310 (talk) 20:23, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The roots of the Ouachita Mountains are believed to stretch all the way into southwestern Texas and the Balcones Fault is believed to be related to them. I think that might have been part of the point the original author was trying to make. At any rate the statement was part misleading and part flat out wrong and I have taken it out.Narthring (talk • contribs) 21:52, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What is the elevation of the highest point? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jesswilson18 (talk • contribs) 02:37, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mount Magazine?

Mount Magazine is not considered part of the Ouachitas. It is a geological remnant and is part of the Arkansas River Valley along with Mount Nebo and Petit Jean Mountain. The tallest peak in the Ouachitas is Rich Mountain, at an elevation of 2681 feet. Bugo 03:56, 19 October 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bugo (talk • contribs)

As of today, the Encyclopedia of Oklahoma History and Culture(EOHC) article about the Ouachita Mountains still indicates this mountain is included by the Ouachita range. I have not yet found a reliable source that claims otherwise. If you have such a source, please supply it. Otherwise, I think the text should be left unchanged as written in the EOHC article. Bruin2 (talk) 21:08, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article reclassification

This article meets the requirements for C class, and I have made this change for WP:Oklahoma today. I also removed the To Do template , which has been empty for some time. Bruin2 (talk) 03:48, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stratigraphy

Just a suggestion - the formations listed in the stratigraphy section could be shown in stratigraphic order, with the oldest/deepest formations at the bottom of the list. It is generally how they are shown in geologic maps or other publications. Jstuby (talk) 01:22, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]