Talk:Ossu (East Timor)
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | This article contains a translation of Ossu from de.wikipedia. |
Ossu (East Timor)
Requested move 25 December 2024
[edit]
 | It has been proposed in this section that Ossu (East Timor) be renamed and moved to Ossu, Timor-Leste. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Ossu (East Timor) → Ossu, Timor-Leste – It is doubtful that "Ossu (East Timor)" is the official name of this populated place. It is also possible that "Ossu" alone is sufficient, since the only other entry in the disambiguation page Ossu has a diacritic in its name: Õssu. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 22:42, 25 December 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Frost 15:13, 2 January 2025 (UTC)— Relisting. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 16:25, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support to Ossu with the DAB page being deleted per WP:SMALLDETAILS. A hatnote should cover any confusion. Turnagra (talk) 02:51, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Could be moved to the base name as East Timor one has 44 views compared with only 9 for the Estonia one but note that per SMALLDETAILS the absence of the diacritics probably doesn't distinguish as English readers are unlikely to know to type diacritics. Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:44, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment this should be held, and continue to be relisted until Wikipedia:Move review § Timor-Leste has been resolved, as that would impact this discussion. TiggerJay (talk) 05:10, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Ossu. No clear primary topic between Ossu (East Timor), Õssu, and possibly Ossu Administrative Post (page views for reference: [1]). I agree with Crouch, Swale on SMALLDETAILS here. I'm fine with the proposed use of a comma. The country name should be consistent with however the move review and potentially reopened RM turn out. Adumbrativus (talk) 08:17, 3 January 2025 (UTC)