Talk:Oligokyphus

Animals Low‑importance

Oligokyphus is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Animals To-do:

Here are some Open Tasks :

Copyedit:
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae),
Requests:
- Mammals:
- Invertebrates: Campocraspedon
- Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel
Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration

Palaeontology Mid‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Vandalism

This page was heavily vandalized some time ago. I removed several junk references and citations. It is possible that the junk citations replaced genuine ones, but I couldn't find the start of the vandalism by searching the revision history. RockMagnetist (talk) 20:27, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

They are not reptiles

OR please remove. --209.188.52.203 (talk) 22:55, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

From all appearances they are simply mammals. They don't even look primitve. 72.73.109.8 (talk) 04:10, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Oligokyphus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100423000530/http://home.arcor.de/ktdykes/jtherap.htm to http://home.arcor.de/ktdykes/jtherap.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:56, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Scelidosaurus from North America

In the paleofauna section, it says that Scelidosaurus lived with Scutellosaurus when Scelidosaurus was only known from Europe, not North America. Magnatyrannus (talk) 18:00, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, it says that Oligokyphus (species) lived with various dinosaurian taxa such as Scutellosaurus and Scelidosaurus. It does NOT say that Scutellosaurus and Scelidosaurus lived with each other. Remember that this article is on Oligokyphus as a genus, not just the Kayenta Formation species.--Kev min § 18:05, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, ok, thanks for the explanation. Magnatyrannus (talk) 18:07, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]