Talk:Old Wolverton Road Bridge

This article was nominated for deletion on 14 November 2024. The result of the discussion was Withdrawn by nom, myself.

This page was proposed for deletion by Mattdaviesfsic (talk · contribs) on 12 November 2024.

Trains: in UK

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways.

Bridges and Tunnels

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Buckinghamshire (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buckinghamshire, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BuckinghamshireWikipedia:WikiProject BuckinghamshireTemplate:WikiProject BuckinghamshireBuckinghamshire articles

Proposed deletion

Mattdaviesfsic - It's a listed structure by a highly notable engineer. I've added Pevsner, is that sufficient for you to remove the Prod? KJP1 (talk) 07:01, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure as I'm not sure what notability guidelines are for bridges/structures. De-prodded in any case as it makes little difference to me. Cheerio, Mattdaviesfsic. About me; Talk to me. Farewell fellow editor... 13:43, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you both. I would say the sources on the article are more than sufficient to pass the GNG, and age + listed status + famous engineer + prominent structure in a railway town makes it highly likely that there are more sources to be found. This is one of the smaller ones but all the surviving bridges and viaducts on the L&BR now have articles so it would seem counter productive to create a gap in that coverage. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:22, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]