Talk:North Staffordshire Regiment/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I will be reviewing this article! MinisterForBadTimes (talk) 20:46, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, I've now finished the review, and the article will pass, subject to a few issues being addressed. Most of these relate only to clarifying small points in the text, and I've placed hidden comments in the text detailing my queries etc.
- All addressed, I think NtheP (talk) 13:58, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
- The only other thing I'd like to suggest is that in the "Battle Honours" section, another way be found to indicate those honours which are carried on the colours. The current ALL CAPS system looks rather clunky. Perhaps use asterisks to indicate those which are on the colours. Or bold? MinisterForBadTimes (talk) 07:36, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
- This came up as part of the B class review where others thought the use of bold was clunky :) Looking at other unit pages, where the differentiation between those honours carrfied on the colours and those not is made the use of capitals does seem to be the most commonly used method. Perhaps something for discussion in WP:MILMOS? NtheP (talk) 13:58, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
- In which case, leave it as it is! Only a minor point anyway. MinisterForBadTimes (talk) 07:27, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
- will do. Will probably raise in WP:MILMOS anyway. NtheP (talk) 08:58, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
- In which case, leave it as it is! Only a minor point anyway. MinisterForBadTimes (talk) 07:27, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
- This came up as part of the B class review where others thought the use of bold was clunky :) Looking at other unit pages, where the differentiation between those honours carrfied on the colours and those not is made the use of capitals does seem to be the most commonly used method. Perhaps something for discussion in WP:MILMOS? NtheP (talk) 13:58, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
GA review of [ this version]:
Pn = paragraph n • Sn = sentence n
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
