Talk:North American Bus Industries

This article is part of WikiProject Alabama, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Alabama on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlabamaWikipedia:WikiProject AlabamaTemplate:WikiProject AlabamaAlabama articles

Buses Start‑class

	Buses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of buses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusesWikipedia:WikiProject BusesTemplate:WikiProject Busesbus transport articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Clean up

I added the clean-up tag. Problems include the changing tense in the first paragraphs and the use of unexplained terminology throughout the article.--WideArc 19:59, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Since it is being sold, I doubt that the difference in tense is a problem. Busjack 16:12, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly agree with the clean-up tag; this article is confused, does not present information in a logical order, and does not give an effective overview of the company, its history or anything else. I'll add it to my 'to-work-on' list. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 16:15, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've spent quite a bit of time cleaning the article up as well as expanding on some points (such as company history and adding some neutrality on the Compobus matter) and have posted a new version up. I've also removed the cleanup tag given that whatever cleanup that needed to be done has been done. Scrabbleship 04:18, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's certainly a lot better - good work! One question - there's little discussion of what Ikarus was, and no Wikilinks either. I presume from the surrounding text that it was a bus manufacturer, but little else. Can you explain further, either here or in a separate article? Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 06:30, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Citizens Area Transit NABI's

I would like to request an addition to the current models pictures section. I work for the transit agency in Las Vegas, and apart from currently recieving our order of 30 NABI 40-LFW Hybrids, we are also currently recieving our order of 20 NABI 40-LFW Diesels. I have uploaded a picture of this vehicle. The file name is "CAT NABI Diesel 2008.jpg". Cello06 (talk) 09:18, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New NABI LFW Look

NABI has either redesigned or restyled the LFW for 2012 Notice the different front end in the brochure. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Playerstroke (talk • contribs) 18:10, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on North American Bus Industries. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130612192224/http://busexplorer.com/WorldBus/Ikarus-Text.html to http://www.busexplorer.com/WorldBus/Ikarus-Text.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nabiusa.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:52, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]