This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight
This page emphasizes the Gao index over the more commonly used McFeeters index, which is a problem since McFeeters is for generally classifying WATER while Gao is directed at classifying vegetation moisture ("proposed for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water" to quote their paper), an important but less common use case. Most of the time, when people are coming here to quickly look up what NDWI is referring to in a paper or how to calculate it, they're going to be looking for the McFeeters equation - in part because it uses more historically commonly collected bands (green and NIR vs NIR and SWIR) which enable longer timeseries analysis for historical comparisons. But the edits have stuck the more common McFeeters index at the bottom like it's an afterthought. This is confusing and going to mislead people who are most likely dealing with the McFeeter equation, not Gao. 199.123.87.25 (talk) 16:14, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]