Talk:Nordsee case

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

European Union Low‑importance

	European Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article should not be deleted as it will be useful to students studyin law, especially European Union law. This case may not be one of the major cases in EU law however it is still important. the ECJ addressed an important issue in this case, and the legal principle established is necassary to answer any question about the enforcement of EU law. The guidelines for notability state that an article will be notable if it addresses academic issues. being an important case in the study of EU law, this article definitely satisfies this requirement. I had trouble finding this case when conducting my own research, and I want future students to be able to locate a summary of this case with ease.

Start a discussion about improving the Nordsee case page

Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Nordsee case" page.

Start a discussion