Talk:No Sleep (LaViVe album)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Freikorp (talk · contribs) 05:55, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
- Is it reasonably well written?
- "noting that the songs sounded like demo versions" - replace noted with 'said' or 'stated' as per WP:WORDS.
- "and picked "I Swear" as the highlight on No Sleep" - I's change this to "... highlight on the album".
- "negatively commented that the record was produced in a considerably short amount of time" - did he mention how the short recording negatively impacted on the album's production? Simply producing an album in a short time would be considered a positive. This needs context if it's available.
Done Yes, there is context on this, and it is how the short time for recording negatively impacted on the album's production. I tried to reword the sentence... Cartoon network freak (talk) 10:00, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- I've always found you very thorough in your articles, but I still have to at least ask, are you sure there isn't any information out there on the album's promotion? And how about tours/live performances?
- There was no specific promotion for the album (or at least I couldn't find anything about that). LaViVe did have a tour for their single "No Time for Sleeping", but that is not promotion for the album itself. Also, the band disbanded soon after the album's release, which further speaks against a possible tour or concerts meant to aid the album. Cartoon network freak (talk) 10:00, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
- I've always found you very thorough in your articles, but I still have to at least ask, are you sure there isn't any information out there on the album's promotion? And how about tours/live performances?
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail: Lookin' good. Placing on hold. Freikorp (talk) 06:12, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Freikorp: Thank you very much for your review! I believe I have answered to all your queries raised above. Best regards; Cartoon network freak (talk) 10:00, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
- Excellent, outstanding work, happy to pass this now. :) Freikorp (talk) 10:12, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Freikorp: Thank you very much for your review! I believe I have answered to all your queries raised above. Best regards; Cartoon network freak (talk) 10:00, 30 March 2018 (UTC)