Talk:Nikolai von Bismarck

This article was nominated for deletion on 14 November 2021. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment / Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph of Nikolai von Bismarck be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Kate Moss

@Hullaballoo Wolfowitz: why the removal of von Bismarck's relationship with Kate Moss? It is cited, and mentioned with sources on her article as well.. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 20:27, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also a quick google search finds more mentions of this relationship ( for example: here and here). -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 20:29, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You added text to the article asserting that the relationship has existed "since 2016". All the references were from 2016. If an article claims a relationship has continued to the present day, a reasonably contemporary source is required -- no more than a year old is a good rule of thumb. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. Fight for freedom, stand with Hong Kong! (talk) 23:46, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Hullaballoo Wolfowitz: reference from 2018 [1] and from 2019 [2]. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 00:55, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]