Talk:Nikki Randall (actress)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nikki Randall (actress) redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Women

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.

Pornography Mid‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Larry Miller (entertainer) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 03:01, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 1b

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: move all. -- tariqabjotu 02:46, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

– (partially unbundled as requested) Undiscussed moves by the same editor year or so back, particularly bad examples of the en.wp craze for the (entertainer) dab. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:36, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support; "(entertainer)" is always a bad way to title an article, and all articles titled that way should be moved to another title. I suppose there will never be a consensus for moving certain present articles, but they are still wrong. 168.12.253.66 (talk) 13:36, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Looks like a bit of prudishness came into the naming here? -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:29, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support for all as it is of key importance for us to be able to most immediately identify our most vital assets. DeistCosmos (talk) 03:07, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support. But wouldn't "(actress)" be more concise? WP:DAB suggests that a two-word disambiguator be used only when one isn't enough to do the job. SpeedDreamer (talk) 11:33, 9 September 2013 (UTC) sock[reply]
- Well, it isn't really. Porn "actresses" are usually about as much actresses as trout are rodents! I think we do need the adjective here to avoid confusing them with people who can actually act. After all, people looking for the porn stars might not realise this was who they were looking for if they saw "actress" without the "pornographic" qualifier - it's not really what they are. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:57, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

(actress)/(pornographic actress) RfC

An RfC which may affect this article's title is currently taking place (Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pornography#RfC: Should a person who has appeared in exclusively pornographic films be described as "(actor/-tress)" or "(pornographic actor/-tress)"?). Rebecca1990 (talk) 07:35, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nikki Randall (actress). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929000000/http://www.avnawards.com/index.php?content=pastwinners to http://www.avnawards.com/index.php?content=pastwinners

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:24, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]