Talk:New Zealand Cross (1999)

Orders, decorations, and medals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of orders, decorations, and medals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Orders, decorations, and medalsWikipedia:WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medalsTemplate:WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medalsOrders, decorations, and medals articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New Zealand High‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:NZCross1999.jpg

Image:NZCross1999.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 21:40, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 18 July 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

It was proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved.

result:
No consensus. See more opposition than support below. Seems a case can be made for either rendition of this award as primary topic, so that might be best ferreted out by continued informal discussion. As is usual with a no-consensus outcome, editors can strengthen their arguments and try again in a few months to garner consensus for title changes. Kudos to all editors for your input, and Happy, Healthy Publishing! (nac by page mover) P.I. Ellsworth - ed. ^put'r there 14:02, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Links: current log • target log

This is template {{subst:Requested move/end}}

New Zealand Cross (1999) → New Zealand Cross
New Zealand Cross → ?

– The majority of readers are looking for the 1999 award rather than the 1869 award (New Zealand Cross (1869)) (see pageviews: [1]) and the trend is increasing over time. Move the 1999 award page to the base name, deleting the current 2-entry disambiguation page which is not required, and use a hatnote to refer to the other article. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:49, 18 July 2021 (UTC) — Relisting. BD2412 T 03:19, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: New Zealand Cross titles a page with content and so it must also be dispositioned. If this request is granted, then New Zealand Cross may be moved to New Zealand Cross (disambiguation) and tagged with {{One other topic}} in accordance with WP:ONEOTHER, or it may be deleted to make way for the first proposed page move. P.I. Ellsworth ed. ^put'r there 19:44, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support: A case for WP:PTOPIC can be made (see views) and if so, WP:TWODABS is the way to go. Schwede 66 08:10, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Only two people have received the 1999 cross, compared to 23 for the 1869 one.The page views do favour the 1999, but it is not overwhelming. Vpab15 (talk) 20:55, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Vpab15. I have added a hatnote template to distinguish the two crosses at the top of both articles. Peter Ormond 💬 03:31, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @Peter Ormond: hatnotes are not required at unambiguous titles, see WP:NAMB. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:50, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguate. Seems like the best solution when one award is viewed more (by about 2x) and the other has been given to more people. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:50, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.