Talk:New York State Route 10

New York State Route 10 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

New York State Route 10 is part of the State highways in Hamilton County, New York series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 6, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed
December 18, 2008	Featured topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

U.S. Roads: State highways / New York Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Topics

U.S. state highways

Locations

New York

This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.

This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Article recognition:

	This article was the Selected article of the New York Roads Portal in August 2010.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:New York State Route 10/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
"6 miles (9.7 km)" is a rounding error. "The run of NY 10 through New York's largest park is predominantly rural yet scenic in nature." - borderline subjective, unless it's marked as a scenic route on a reliable map, or described as such by a reliable source.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
~~"The entire length of NY 10A is kept clean under the Adopt-A-Highway program by the Residents of Route 10A." - needs a reference.~~

Removed; only possible reference would be a photo. Fwgoebel (talk) 11:28, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Maybe want to mention elevation or whether or not the route is in hilly terrain, but that's optional.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
~~Umm... no images for a 155 mile road? This qualifies as a dealbreaker, unfortunately. :-(~~
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Needs an image, IMHO. If it was a short state route 200 miles from the nearest city, I would understand, but this one seems to stretch, and I can't really imagine it in my mind. —Rob (talk) 03:49, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done - The ones that Fwogebel didn't get I have fixed.Mitch32^(UP) 10:24, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh and - Pictures are not easy you know :P Mitch32^(UP) 10:24, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know... it seems kind of arbitrary, but pics of a road are much easier than people - the road's location is known, it's just a matter of getting there. (I don't even think fair-use pics of living people are allowed on Wikipedia, so we should exceed that standard.) —Rob (talk) 16:11, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the image that was removed is OK... it looked like NY 10 was on that road. Alternatively, a good overview image of a city on the route (that just happens to have the route of NY 10 in the picture) would also be acceptable. —Rob (talk) 17:30, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There are now five (5) photos, not including the deleted one (I did get one of the same intersection, but showing more). If five is too much, we can reduce. I concentrated on the northern 2/3 of the route for those. Oh, and...there have never been any cities on NY 10. :-) Fwgoebel (talk) 03:06, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cities, hamlets, towns... they're all the same to me. :-D Looks good now; thanks! —Rob (talk) 16:02, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on New York State Route 10. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080823113312/http://www.ontarioroadmaps.ca/Oil_Companies/Esso/1959/Maps/EasternOntario.jpg to http://www.ontarioroadmaps.ca/Oil_Companies/Esso/1959/Maps/EasternOntario.jpg

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:30, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in New York State Route 10

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of New York State Route 10's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "2008tvr":

From New York State Route 218: "2008 Traffic Volume Report for New York State" (PDF). New York State Department of Transportation. June 16, 2009. p. 189. Retrieved February 1, 2010.
From New York State Route 67: "2008 Traffic Volume Report for New York State" (PDF). New York State Department of Transportation. June 16, 2009. pp. 126–128. Retrieved January 30, 2010.
From New York State Route 23: "2008 Traffic Volume Report for New York State" (PDF). New York State Department of Transportation. June 16, 2009. pp. 71–74, 262. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 27, 2012. Retrieved January 31, 2010. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
From U.S. Route 9W: "2008 Traffic Volume Report for New York State" (PDF). New York State Department of Transportation. June 16, 2009. pp. 30–32. Retrieved May 26, 2010.
From New York State Route 29A: "2008 Traffic Volume Report for New York State" (PDF). New York State Department of Transportation. June 16, 2009. pp. 88, 266. Retrieved January 31, 2010.
From New York State Route 163: "2008 Traffic Volume Report for New York State" (PDF). New York State Department of Transportation. June 16, 2009. pp. 175–176. Retrieved February 1, 2010.
From New York State Route 17: "2008 Traffic Volume Report for New York State" (PDF). New York State Department of Transportation. June 16, 2009. pp. 50–57. Retrieved 2010-01-30.
From New York State Route 29: "2008 Traffic Volume Report for New York State" (PDF). New York State Department of Transportation. June 16, 2009. pp. 87–88, 266. Retrieved January 31, 2010.
From Interstate 90 in New York: "2008 Traffic Volume Report for New York State" (PDF). New York State Department of Transportation. June 16, 2009. pp. 146–149. Retrieved January 31, 2010.
From New York State Route 145: "2008 Traffic Volume Report for New York State" (PDF). New York State Department of Transportation. June 16, 2009. p. 171. Retrieved February 1, 2010.
From New York State Route 385: "2008 Traffic Volume Report for New York State" (PDF). New York State Department of Transportation. June 16, 2009. p. 224. Retrieved February 1, 2010.
From New York State Route 166: "2008 Traffic Volume Report for New York State" (PDF). New York State Department of Transportation. June 16, 2009. p. 176. Retrieved February 1, 2010.
From U.S. Route 209: "2008 Traffic Volume Report for New York State" (PDF). New York State Department of Transportation. June 16, 2009. pp. 187–188. Retrieved February 1, 2010.
From New York State Route 51: "2008 Traffic Volume Report for New York State" (PDF). New York State Department of Transportation. June 16, 2009. pp. 115–116. Retrieved January 31, 2010.
From New York State Route 365: "2008 Traffic Volume Report for New York State" (PDF). New York State Department of Transportation. June 16, 2009. pp. 219–220. Retrieved January 31, 2010.
From New York State Route 22: New York State Department of Transportation (2009), pp. 68–71.
From New York State Route 144: "2008 Traffic Volume Report for New York State" (PDF). New York State Department of Transportation. June 16, 2009. pp. 170–171. Retrieved February 1, 2010.
From U.S. Route 202 in New York: "2008 Traffic Volume Report for New York State" (PDF). New York State Department of Transportation. June 16, 2009. pp. 183–184. Retrieved January 31, 2010.
From New York State Route 396: "2008 Traffic Volume Report for New York State" (PDF). New York State Department of Transportation. June 16, 2009. p. 227. Retrieved February 1, 2010.
From New York State Route 122: "2008 Traffic Volume Report for New York State" (PDF). New York State Department of Transportation. June 16, 2009. pp. 166–167. Retrieved February 1, 2010.
From New York State Route 80: "2008 Traffic Volume Report for New York State" (PDF). New York State Department of Transportation. June 16, 2009. pp. 134–135. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 27, 2012. Retrieved January 31, 2010. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:15, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

NY 8/NY 10 Discrepancy

I’m posting this on the New York State Route 8 and New York State Route 10 talk pages because I plan to resolve the discrepancy about the former NY 8 and NY 10 overlap. The NY 10 article indicates they no longer overlap and uses a 2017 NYSDOT document to justify that position. The NY 8 article claims the 2017 document is erroneous and the routes still overlap.

I contacted the NYSDOT 9 Public Information Officer, who pursued this with the NYSDOT 9 Traffic & Safety Director and the Delaware South Resident Engineer. I was informed that Reference Marker 1000 (the indication of the start of a New York Route) for NY 8 is at the former split of NY 8 and NY 10. Therefore, NY 8 begins where NY 10 turns right to head east along the Cannonsville Reservoir. No one was willing to state definitively that all NY 8 reference signs were removed between NY 17 and the current start of NY 8.

I plan to perform the updates to both articles in about a week. Incidentally, I checked GoogleMaps and MapQuest. MapQuest identifies the section of road in question as NY 10. GoogleMaps identifies it as NY 8. I’ll contact GoogleMaps after I’ve made the changes.WarrenFW (talk) 05:54, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]