Jump to content

Talk:Nevada State Route 535

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 01 December 2014

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page at this time, per the discussion below and the concurrent discussion at Talk:Nevada State Route 794. Dekimasuよ! 10:02, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Nevada State Route 535Interstate 80 Business (Elko, Nevada) – SR 535 is a subsection of Business Loop 80 in Elko, which is otherwise signed with no other state highways along its length – Famartin (talk) 10:00, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Famartin (talk) 10:33, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support as nom: Given that SR 535 consists of two short disconnected sections of Business Loop 80, and that Business Loop 80 is both more than double the length of SR 535 and is not co-signed with any other state routes, it would seem appropriate to move the article. I don't have the evidence to support it but I suspect the whole of current BL 80 was once SR 222 and was redesignated and reduced to the current SR 535 when the City of Elko assumed control of the majority of the roadway. Famartin (talk) 10:33, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
To closer: it should have been "support as nom" because nominator voted for it. (You can erase this message if the vote is corrected.) --Gh87 in the public computer (talk) 22:01, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, fixed Famartin (talk) 02:45, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose: I currently do not believe the Nevada I-80 business loops should have their own articles at this time. There are 10 I-80 BLs in Nevada, and I would prefer to see these dealt with more uniformly, as each has some complexity as to status, underlying state routes, etc. In the meantime, I think it would be much better to summarize all the business loops at Business routes of Interstate 80 (the Wendover FA being an exception) instead of keeping some at separate articles and others elsewhere. -- LJ  10:46, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.