Talk:Nestor Lakoba/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: K.e.coffman (talk · contribs) 01:33, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

I will be reviewing this article; will get to it shortly. --K.e.coffman (talk) 01:33, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

• I've requested Kotkin from the library so that I can do some spot checks. I will resume the review in about a week's time. --K.e.coffman (talk) 16:18, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Sounds good. I have this page watched so I'll be looking out for any comments. Though due to my schedule I may not immediately respond, but I will get to it soon as I can. Kaiser matias (talk) 17:12, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Kotkin 2017 checks out; I AGF on the rest of the sources. The article is in great shape; no concerns here. --K.e.coffman (talk) 01:47, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Assessment against GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: