Talk:Nestor Lakoba

Nestor Lakoba is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 17, 2020.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 21, 2019	Good article nominee	Listed
October 21, 2019	Featured article candidate	Promoted

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 9, 2006.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that Nestor Lakoba, a Soviet Communist Party chief in Abkhazia, was probably poisoned by Lavrentiy Beria, who then had his wife and son killed?

Current status: Featured article

Biography: Military / Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Abkhazia Mid‑importance

	Abkhazia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Abkhazia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Abkhazia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AbkhaziaWikipedia:WikiProject AbkhaziaTemplate:WikiProject AbkhaziaAbkhazia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Military history: Biography / Russian & Soviet

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

Limited recognition Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Limited recognition, a WikiProject dedicated to improving the coverage of entities with limited recognition on Wikipedia by contributing to articles relating to unrecognized states and separatist movements. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join our WikiProject by signing your name at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.Limited recognitionWikipedia:WikiProject Limited recognitionTemplate:WikiProject Limited recognitionLimited recognition articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Soviet Union: Military Low‑importance

	Soviet Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force.

Georgia (country) Low‑importance

	Georgia (country) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (country), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Georgia and Georgians on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Georgia (country)Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia (country)Template:WikiProject Georgia (country)Georgia (country) articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Asia

	Asia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article was created or improved during WikiProject Asia's "Asian 10,000 Challenge", which started in October 2016 and is still continuing. You can help!

Photograh

I think that this photo is wrong, because he doesn't look like the real Nestor Lakova. You could check it in these photographs: http://www.ogoniok.com/common/archive/2004/4830/03-10-10/03-10-1b.jpg http://www.hrono.info/statii/2004/rukovod.jpg (first left) http://www.hrono.info/statii/2004/lakoba_molod.jpg http://www.kapba.de/Nestor_Lakoba.jpg

This photograph could be of other Lakoba's brother, but not Nestor. --Shliahov (talk) 23:53, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is hard to tell, his appearance significantly changed with age. My very best wishes (talk) 05:01, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I looked in the book "Beria" by Antonov-Ovseenko. There are so many mistakes and important missing info in this page... One should compare with respective article on ruwiki which is much better. My very best wishes (talk) 05:01, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ibid.

I used the initial revision to expand all ibid.s. Please see this edit. jonkerz ♠talk 14:45, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nestor Lakoba. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060830223536/http://www.diacritica.com:80/degenerate/9/beria1.html to http://www.diacritica.com/degenerate/9/beria1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:06, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Nestor Lakoba/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: K.e.coffman (talk · contribs) 01:33, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I will be reviewing this article; will get to it shortly. --K.e.coffman (talk) 01:33, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've requested Kotkin from the library so that I can do some spot checks. I will resume the review in about a week's time. --K.e.coffman (talk) 16:18, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. I have this page watched so I'll be looking out for any comments. Though due to my schedule I may not immediately respond, but I will get to it soon as I can. Kaiser matias (talk) 17:12, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kotkin 2017 checks out; I AGF on the rest of the sources. The article is in great shape; no concerns here. --K.e.coffman (talk) 01:47, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment against GA criteria: GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Legacy

I found the last sentence of the "Legacy" section confusing: "The papers were first brought to Batumi, Georgia. Starting in the 1980s they were slowly returned to Abkhazia, with many eventually given to Princeton and Stanford Universities." It just seems weird that they would be returned to Abkhazia and then given to two American universities. Do we have any idea why? AmericanLemming (talk) 00:11, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I believe it was because the political situation in Abkhazia, especially in the late 1980s-early 1990s, meant it was dangerous to keep sensitive documents there (and in fact the Abkhazian archives were destroyed in 1992). I will check to see if there is an explicit reason for why the documents were sent to the US, but I can say that Princeton and Stanford are leading universities for Russian studies, with Stanford in particular having a large collection of archival material from Russia and the Soviet Union housed in its library. Kaiser matias (talk) 21:00, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MOS isueses

Hello Kaiser matias, great job with this article getting FA even though that's two years ago. Anyway I see there are some MOS issues here.

Per MOS:OSNS we should use both Old and New Styles in Russian-related articles before 14 February 1918. Thus he was born in Russia on 1 May 1893 thus it's unclear which calendar this is.
His born isn't included in the body per MOS:LEAD the most important events should be included in the lead.
"working with them from the autumn of 1911 and officially joining them in September 1912" Per MOS:SEASONS we should avoid using seasons in articles this can be confusing for people in the southern hemisphere or people who only use wet and dry seasons around the equator. This also applies to "In the autumn of 1918".
"The ethnic Abkhaz only constituted roughly 25–30% of the population during the 1920s and 1930s" Per MOS:PERCENT we should use the word percent (or per cent in British English) instead of the symbol.

That's everything. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 15:45, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@CPA-5: Thanks for going through the article and catching those. I'll get through it myself soon as I can. Kaiser matias (talk) 19:02, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]