Jump to content

Talk:Nepal Scouts

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

image

[edit]

Can someone put this text File:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg into the organization name on the article? Thanks Chris 07:43, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The image Image:Boy Scouts India Badge.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --22:32, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nepal Independent Scouts Association (NISA)

[edit]

Has anyone seen this Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Nepal Independent Scouts Association (NISA)? Any comments? --evrik (talk) 15:30, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

about crew.

[edit]

Why i cant post about one scout crew of nepal? I want to make world knowing YHOC it's progress and activites of this crew mantis (talk) 04:53, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is there anything wrong to post a type of scout with example mantis (talk) 05:02, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As has been patiently explained to you, the topic is non-notable, your article is up for deletion, and the more you put it in, it looks like vanity on your part. Curse me all you like, your edits of this nature will not stand.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 05:29, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please just put YHOC in artical mantis (talk) 11:03, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No. YHOC is going to be deleted, the topic is non-notable. Please read WP:NOTABILITY. It's time for you to stop.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 11:05, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why non-notable? This is a register scout crew of nepal scout. First take information from nepal scout office mantis (talk) 11:18, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We are authorized group of nepal. so why you interfair with me? First take our information from nepal scout office. mantis (talk) 11:20, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Try to understand. That is an adervertisement and we didnt want to promote. This is a offical crew of nepal scout. Is any post is against of scout and scout law. We are scout so we want to include in nepal scout. If you repate this activity, i will talk with nepal scout office mantis (talk) 11:40, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Manishbhandari783: Wikipedia is no register of all existing Scout units. The only single units mentioned are mostly notable of their own - as the oldest in the repective country or by media coverage.
It is understandable that you want to include your group in this article - but that's not the way Wikipedia works. And please refrain from threatening other users or calling them names; this is very un-Scout-like and may lead to a block of your access to Wikipedia. --jergen (talk) 13:39, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Readability fixed?

[edit]

This article still has the 'needs copy reading' flag, but seems pretty readable to me. Should this flag be removed? --BLu (talk) 15:19, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nepal Scouts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:25, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nepal Scouts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:33, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]