Talk:Neither one nor many

Philosophy: Metaphysics / Eastern Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Metaphysics
	Eastern philosophy

Comments

[2]
Berzin, source: [3]

B9 hummingbird hovering^{(talk • contribs)} 14:05, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

THUPTEN JINPA DELINEATING REASON’S SCOPE FOR NEGATION TSONGKHAPA’S CONTRIBUTION TO MADHYAMAKA’S DIALECTICAL METHOD

Dharmatā
Lalitavistara (xiii.102, p 176)
bījasya sato yantāṅkuro na ca yo bīja sa cāiva aṅuro/
na ca tato na cāiva tat evamanuccheda aśāśvata dharmatā/

"In the same way as when a sprout [is produced] from an existent seed the seed is not the sprout - neither [is it simply different] from it nor [is it simply identical] with it-, just so, [the seed being] neither destroyed [i.e. completely different form its sprout] nor eternal [i.e. completely identical with its sprout], [that is] the [real] nature of things (dharmatā)."
Chandrakirtī comments:

pratītya yad yad bhavati na hi tāvat tad eva tat/
na cānyad api tat tasmān nōchinaṃ nāpiśāśvatam/

"That which comes into existence in dependence is, then, not that, nor is it other, either. Thus, it is neither destroyed nor eternal." ^[1]

Blessed Catuskoti
B9 hummingbird hovering^{(talk • contribs)} 11:03, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

^ Source: [1] (accessed: May 17, 2009)

Requested move 4 November 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 01:14, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Neither one nor many (gcig du 'bral ba'i gtan tshigs) → Neither one nor many – Unnecessary parenthetical phrase. Shall I explain more? George Ho (talk) 05:19, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support. No need to say more. 209.211.131.181 (talk) 14:27, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

[1] Source: [1] (accessed: May 17, 2009)

[1]