Jump to content

Talk:Neal Asher

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Hilldiggers.jpg

[edit]

Image:Hilldiggers.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:35, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:SableKeech.jpg

[edit]

Image:SableKeech.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:53, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:PolityAgent.jpg

[edit]

Image:PolityAgent.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:23, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cyberpunk? Postcyberpunk?

[edit]

I don't suppose anyone has bothered to come up with authorities who apply these genre labels to Asher's work--? "Space opera" is almost certainly apt and verifiable, but these two might prove more of a challenge--particularly the latter, since "postcyberpunk" has yet to establish itself in the critical/reviewing vocabulary outside on-line discussion and advocates for its entry in WP. RLetson (talk) 03:14, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Series Order

[edit]

Prador Moon and Shadow of the Scorpion are explicitly numbered #1 and #3 respectively by the publishers. Hilldiggers is just labelled "A book in the Polity Series" but is the only one published between the other two, and no other book is numbered as Polity #2. I do not have any of the short story collections, so have not (re)moved any of the short story lines to sit under the collection. --Quuux (talk) 03:27, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think the series order in internal chronology is wrong. Soldier comes after the Technician and the Penny Royal books. This is clear from references in Warship, which is missing from that chronology. Stevelinton (talk) 21:54, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

While not commenting on the specific points you make, Asher has noted before (on his Facebook page) that there are errors in the internal chronology (e.g., Book A refers to events in Book B being in the past, Book B refers to Book C being in the past, Book C refers to Book A being in the past). It probably isn't possible to have a 100% clean chronology. QuiteUnusual (talk) 08:16, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"He worked as a machinist and machine programmer from 1979 to 1987 and as a gardener from 1979 to 1987."

[edit]

Is this accurate? Was he a machinist/machine programmer and a gardener simultaneously? DrSkrud (talk) 18:08, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bibliography

[edit]

I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates and tables for short stories, poems and/or book reviews. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. Feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 08:30, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The chronology appears to be inaccurate. Either that, or there is internal inconsistency in the books. In The Warship there is reference to the events of the Transformation series. Specifically, in one of Blade's chapters, it has the following - "This lesson had been learned in recent Polity history with the trouble the forensic swarm AI the Brockle, as well as the legendary Penny Royal, had caused." Either the author was mistaken in his reddit post dating this series as circa 2550, or he messed up the timeline in writing The Warship. Jeffnonumber (talk) 10:11, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Neal Asher. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:11, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Neal Asher. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:19, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Neal Asher. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:24, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Neal_Asher&oldid=1198085027"