Talk:Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 4 November 2020
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) BegbertBiggs (talk) 13:18, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
Naval Facilities Engineering Command → Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command – Official name change i am me (talk) 00:28, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 13:48, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- @John.wang@navy.mil and IVORK: queried move request Anthony Appleyard (talk) 13:49, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Hi there John.wang@navy.mil, do you have a public source for this change? There isn't any reference to the new title on the article. Also as was aforementioned on your talk page some 14 years ago, it is advised you look to change your username — IVORK Talk 02:52, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- The name change seems to have been published on 3 November. We could wait for another source, such as USNI News, to also confirm, but the source of the link is authoritative. Please see this link: [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Concertmusic (talk • contribs) 14:55, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- For an authoritative source, please see this link: [2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by John.wang@navy.mil (talk • contribs) 00:30, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- That's about as authoritative as can be. If this discussion is to be closed and the name change is agreed upon, I'd be happy to do the work. I am not sure about the proper procedures to get to closure, however. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Concertmusic (talk • contribs) 00:46, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- Hi @IVORK and Anthony Appleyard:. Now that consensus has been reached, how do we close this discussion and move this page? Thanks for the guidance.
- Oppose but would not object to relisting. The above discussion seems purely about official names and other primary sources. If those are the only sources using the new name as yet, than the move is premature at least. Andrewa (talk) 16:14, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
• Support. This matches the command's name as listed on the NAVFAC website: https://www.navfac.navy.mil/ Joelrothschild (talk) 16:20, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
- Support - clearly that's the name now, so let's get this done with and move on. - wolf 12:25, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- Support consistent with the other system commands, and it’s so small I wouldn’t expect a large amount of non–primary sources. Garuda28 (talk) 14:03, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Categories:
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- C-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- C-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- Start-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class United States military history articles
- Start-Class United States Government articles
- Low-importance United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States articles