Talk:Nato.0+55+3d

Apple Inc. Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Wikipedia:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc. articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing: Software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Mid-importance).

Level of agressivity

The recent edit by an anonymous user is giving a bit too much importance to the "NN controversy", imho. His version:

"Therefore, despite ~~(or thanks to)~~ the controversies raised by the ultra-aggressive self representation of the authors (aka "korporat warfare") and the mechanisms of arbitrariness and control that the users were subjected to, it gained popularity among video artists and performers, which were using it for a large variety of purposes, prominently for live performance and interactive installation."

my comments:

"despite ~~(or thanks to)~~": i think it's clear that the provocative style also helped to promote the software, proof is that many of the notable users were "imitating" the nato style... so i'd keep "(or thanks to)" in this sentence (at least, the "positive" impact of their PR should be mentioned in some way).
"ultra-aggressive" - sounds a bit too emotional/un-encyclopedic, i think "aggressive" will do it (after all nobody was killed or injuried)
"the mechanisms of arbitrariness and control that the users were subjected to" - i guess this refers to the fact that licenses of some users were "revoked"? well, it was really more a joke than anything else, since the software was still working (but of course for people psychologically dependent on NN, it was certainly traumatizing...) - i will leave this sentence for now but i think it should be supported by some factual evidence... H9x (talk) 19:23, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Citations

Since I added footnotes and citations to the article, i'm removing the "citations missing" tag that was applied in April 2007. bzzp 15:34, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can anybody identify from which Nato workshop is this video? The instructor is Johnny Dekam, and the server says the file is from December 2000 ... so it could be the workshop at V2_Lab Rotterdam. Any witnesses around? --Irina666 (talk) 21:26, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removing the Confusing / POV tags

The article has been tagged in January 2011 by user Jclemens, meaning that it "may be confusing or unclear to readers" and "checked for its neutrality".

I have completed it as much as I could, and simplified the introductory paragraph that sounded indeed quite confusing (using terms such as "the real time video revolution" without further comment). I hope that the article now explains rather clearly what the software did.

In terms of "POV", I think that after the cleanup the article is now very objective, and properly sourced. I am therefore removing those tags, in agreement with Jclemens. --1904.CC (talk) 14:18, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Nato.0+55+3d. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:07, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Nato.0+55+3d. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:22, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nato.0+55+3d. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160217022326/http://www.bek.no/%7Ehc/242pilots/ to http://www.bek.no/~hc/242pilots/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:58, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]