Talk:National Organ Transplant Act of 1984

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Country?

Cannot categorise this as the country of jurisdiction is not indicated. Author has left this to guesswork. --Cnbrb 01:01, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's a US law. WhatamIdoing 00:41, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

Is there relevance "cyclosporin" and NOTA? The numbers of the Cyclosporin paragraph also do not seem to line up. Jjessiejayy (talk) 12:30, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Summoned by bot): This is the second-ever discussion on this page, and the first since 2007. Is an RfC really necessary here? C F A 💬 19:41, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's malformed too - the {{rfc}} tag, being a block template, must never be placed in a section heading. There's also no indication that WP:RFCBEFORE has been tried, let alone exhausted, so I've yanked it. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:02, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry about that, I'm new to Wikipedia and I tried to figure out what to do since this page hasn't gotten attention and someone from the wiki-discord recommended RFC. I will look into the RFCBEFORE stuff before RFC next time Jjessiejayy (talk) 22:39, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]