Talk:National Front (Iran)

	Iran portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Politics: Political parties

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

incomplete

Just noting: the page in the "The Mossadegh Era (1949-1953)" says, "Prior to the coup, the National Front was made up of four main parties;" then the page lists 3 of them. (the Iran Party, the Toilers Party of the Iranian Nation and the Mojâhedine Eslâm). I'm not a historian on this topic -- but someone should who is, should add the fourth party, it's very weird/incomplete without it. 73.222.116.94 (talk) 12:36, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism

Reversed some vandalism to page by a person called "shahin rah", who has deleted/defaced extensively several pages of opponents to Iranian govt. Please be on alert to correct these changes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by FreeIran2010 (talk • contribs) 02:26, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

objectivity

this article is truly unobjective!

Middle class supporters edit

This edit (deleting the adjective "middle class") http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=National_Front_%28Iran%29&diff=278707845&oldid=277926062

by kneejuan claims "removing subjective biased wording" in the edit summary. The description is that of a notable historican. It's no more subjective than anything else in the article. --BoogaLouie (talk) 18:59, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We can not classify a political party or movement with projective terminology, because of the opinion of one author. No other political party on Wikipedia is classified by "class". --KneeJuan (talk) 01:18, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Any description can be called "an opinion". Why aren't "Nationalist, Liberal, and Social-Democratic" - other descriptions of the party - also "opinions"? This is the judgment of a reputable notable scholar.

There are many political parties in many countries with a base of support in one social class or another - middle class, working class, peasant, whatever. As for No other political party on Wikipedia is classified by "class", there are at least a couple of parties called middle class parites - Middle Class Party of Netherlands, Reichspartei des deutschen Mittelstandes of germany and no doubt others with articles in wikipedia --BoogaLouie (talk) 21:51, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just a comment under the picture of Mossadegh it is stated that he was the first democratically elected Prime Minister of Iran. This is untrue before him was a slew of Prime Ministers that were elected in the same fashion. This incorrect has to be fixed. 213.185.224.44 (talk) 15:58, 29 August 2010 (UTC)Elias[reply]

Incorrect Caption

Just a comment under the picture of Mossadegh it is stated that he was the first democratically elected Prime Minister of Iran. This is untrue before him was a slew of Prime Ministers that were elected in the same fashion. This incorrect statement has to be fixed by someone that knows how. UTC)Elias —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.185.224.44 (talk) 15:59, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on National Front (Iran). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140529181652/http://graduateinstitute.ch/files/live/sites/iheid/files/sites/political_science/shared/political_science/3213/Material/Hwa%20Lee/1953%20Coup.pdf to http://graduateinstitute.ch/files/live/sites/iheid/files/sites/political_science/shared/political_science/3213/Material/Hwa%20Lee/1953%20Coup.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:47, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]