Talk:National Catholic Forensic League

Past Winners

Does anyone have a list of past NCFL winners? TheTrueSora 19:34, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Check here:

http://www.ncfl.org/gnt/gntpast/gntpast.html

Not sure if there's an easy way to get all that info onto the page though. I put what I could find for my old event of LD.

Red375 17:58, 24 February 2007 (UTC)red375

Propose merging Washington Arlington Catholic Forensics League here

I've just been asked to review Washington Arlington Catholic Forensics League by its author, ImVeryAwesome, and I couldn't find enough sources to establish that it passes the notability guidelines for organisations. It looks like the content of that page might fit well here in a "chapters" section or similar - what do others think? — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 09:33, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Per the parent article, "As of January, 2011, there were 65 active dioceses with CFL leagues." so we potentially could have a lot of sibling articles like this one. Merging this to the parent would give it WP:UNDUE weight over its 64 siblings. I'd be inclined to keep it as a separate article if it is notable. If it's merged its content would have to be extremely edited down. Thanks for dropping by at WP:Proposed mergers. That sure has been a relatively lonely place for quite some time now. Wbm1058 (talk) 15:35, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I like the idea of merging it with NCFL, but think it is better to keep it as its own page. Just to explore another option, Wbm1058 said it would give it undue weight over the other dioceses, but I think even if it ends up not being notable enough to have its own page (I think it is but I am the author) that merging is an acceptable idea. If we got some of the other notable regions like ones with lots of past championship winners, and only gave them mini sections within a dioceses section, then that would not really be giving them undue weight as they would have more notabillity. As for the notability, I will see how many pages mention mine and link them all. ImVeryAwesome (talk) 00:19, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't look like there is consensus for a merge, so I've removed the merge banners, and instead I've nominated Washington Arlington Catholic Forensics League for deletion. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Washington Arlington Catholic Forensics League. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 04:23, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on National Catholic Forensic League. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:30, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Assumes prior knowledge.

A list of true facts is not an explanation nor a definition. For example what is a speech and debate league? That could use a whole section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CFCE:1EE0:299D:BB30:7A98:A27D (talk) 04:19, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]