Jump to content

Talk:NCAA basketball championships (Philippines)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeNCAA basketball championships (Philippines) was a Sports and recreation good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 11, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed

Recent changes and vandalism

[edit]

I have reverted recent acts of vandalism conducted by Ayusin. The acts comprise unexplained edits involving deletions of lists that have been long undisturbed and maintained by community consensus. The edits cannot be said to have been made in good faith due to the lack of explanation and the arbitrary conduct prevailing in the edits. Further, there have been edits made by the said user involving the use of names that do not reflect the colloquial references to individuals. While these may spell out the complete name, community consensus has long held the appropriateness of using the names by which popular individuals are named when placing them in lists, with the proper or given names elucidated in the individual person's article, if any, instead. Rmcsamson (talk) 20:20, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In reference to the above comment on names, see WP:COMMONNAME. Rmcsamson (talk) 20:24, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Good article nomination for NCAA basketball championships (Philippines) has failed, for the following reason:

The article is doing great but the lead section is too short and there are short sections of the article. Anonymous_anonymous_Have a Nice Day 18:29, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

correct me if i'm wrong but shouldn't ateneo's total champion juniors team be 9 instead of 6

changed it. Circa 1900 12:00, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bomberslogo.jpg

[edit]

Image:Bomberslogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:44, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The image Image:CSB-Blazers.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --03:09, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on NCAA Basketball Championship (Philippines). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:56, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 19 March 2023

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) -- Maddy from Celeste (WAVEDASH) 20:03, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


– Each of these articles involve multiple actual championships, so it has to be plural. Now since each doesn't refer to an individual championship, it is a common name. I am soliciting suggestions on where "(Philippines)" appears, if applicable; is it at the end, or after "NCAA"? Howard the Duck (talk) 21:37, 19 March 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 14:44, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per WP:SINGULAR. These are single things with multiple editions. The article is rightly Super Bowl, not Super Bowls. Quale (talk) 15:17, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Every item has at least two separate and distinct championships; the chess ones, for example, have Seniors' and Juniors' championships. There's not just one "NCAA Chess Championship," but two. Howard the Duck (talk) 23:48, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Quale: do you still disagree with this move? Elli (talk | contribs) 06:07, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I do disagree, but a quick look showed me NCAA Division I Outdoor Track and Field Championships – Men's 100 meter dash which is similar and uses the plural. I may be out of step with common Wikipedia practice. Quale (talk) 22:27, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The NCAA in the US and the NCAA in the Philippines are different organizations, and are organized differently. For sports with specific events or disciplines (such as swimming, taekwondo and track), individual event champions are indeed lost to history; what WP:RS list are the tournament seniors and juniors champions. Howard the Duck (talk) 23:39, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support each are basically two in one articles (Junior and Senior championships) Hariboneagle927 (talk) 21:55, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding the placing of "Philippines". I would argue that we could have it as "NCAA Philippines X championships" instead as per WP:NATDIS. "NCAA Philippines" (or National Collegiate Athletic Association of the Philippines) itself is a name used by the organization. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 22:14, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It is not called "NCAA Philippines" in common parlance. No one says "NCAA Philippines Season 98". Howard the Duck (talk) 01:42, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question Shouldn't there be some Consistency with all NCAA Championships? 1AmNobody24 (talk) 14:07, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
NCAA (Philippines) is not related to the NCAA in the US. Howard the Duck (talk) 02:01, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, but does that matter? Both are athletic associations so the naming should be the same. Having the country in brackets should be fine, but the rest should be the same, no matter the country. 1AmNobody24 (talk) 05:12, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Good question. The US NCAA has articles for each different championship and tournament; in the Philippines, all championships in one sport (or discipline, for example, 3×3 basketball and beach volleyball are treated differently) is under one article. It's akin in having the US NCAA's 3 divisional basketball championships under one article. In the US articles, it makes sense for it to be in singular and as a proper noun; in the Philippines articles, it makes sense for it to be as a common noun and in plural.
Also, it makes sense for the Philippine NCAA and the UAAP articles to be named exactly alike (save for the dab).
So this is a question of how the articles are organized. The US treata every championship separately, in the Philippines, all championships under one sport are under one article. Howard the Duck (talk) 11:24, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: WikiProject Basketball has been notified of this discussion. ASUKITE 15:34, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: WikiProject Women's sport has been notified of this discussion. ASUKITE 15:34, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Rookie of the year 2002 NCAA Juniors

[edit]

the Rookie of the year in 2002 Juniors NCAA is Pj Walsham of Collegio De San Juan De Letran 125.253.50.31 (talk) 16:11, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done as per this request, and as per this. Howard the Duck (talk) 21:14, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]