Talk:Multiculturalism

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Multiculturalism article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2: 3 months

Human rights Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology High‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Discrimination High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Ethnic groups High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Meta-tasks:
- Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project.
- Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
Start an article:
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

Culture

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CultureWikipedia:WikiProject CultureTemplate:WikiProject Cultureculture
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Caryhuang98, AgceQ156, Dogalind, Lorchave, Marsrangerover.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:35, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RfC: Permission to cite a peer-reviewed study

Can we cite a peer-reviewed study from the Journal of Economic Growth [1] which found that ethnic diversity at the city-level had a positive impact on wages, productivity and economic growth. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 15:24, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Yes, of course. The study was removed by an editor who overwhelmingly edits content related to Muslims and immigration in Europe. The editor suggested that the study was misrepresented. The study explicitly states in the abstract: "we find that the relationship between diversity and growth is positive for small geographical areas." The other editor claims that the abstract also finds that diversity is bad at the national level, but that's not what the study finds. The other editor is misreading the abstract: the abstract is citing other research, which the study then juxtaposes with the findings of this particular study. The body of the article, which the other editor has not read, fleshes this out. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 15:29, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I removed the RFC tag as non-neutrally worded and vague. The initial objection was not that the source couldn't be used, but that it was being used improperly. Moreover, this seems to have stemmed from a minor content dispute over a month ago that resulted in a total of 4 comments between 2 parties. An RfC for this is both early (not enough discussion) and late (why wait so long?). Another option here would have been WP:3O, but given the time lapse involved, it might be worth trying to restart discussion first. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 16:33, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Another version of the abstract

The mitpressjournals.org link posted by Snoggan has a shorter version of the abstract. The abstract I was citing is this one, which says Empirical research working with cross-country data finds a negative, or statistically in- significant, relationship. That's the abstract I cited in this edit. It is true that I don't have access to the complete study. In general enWP prefers WP:SECONDARY sources to WP:PRIMARY sources and therefore this source is stronger on research it has evaluated, rather than the research it contains. A Thousand Words (talk) 07:30, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

France ?

cette page ne mentionne pratiquement pas la France why?
The same could be said for several other countries. Is it because France isnt' considered by Wikipedians to be multicultural, or is it that the Wikipedians themselves are not multicultural? 78.115.95.9 (talk) 07:35, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

France is now included. Rjensen (talk) 08:48, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! However I feel that France is still under-described.
This page needs more balanced information about several countries including France; it could be widened - from immigration to include other issues, from post-WW2 Algerian and Vietnamese immigration to other sources, and deepened to previous events (and even previous centuries), and perhaps also issues of breton basque or corsican culture, and assimilation of other people into the French identity. In addition one might simplify some of the reference to "republican" thought.

But I am not a political scientist nor a historian, so some other Wikipedian(s) would definitely be better qualified to do this. -- jw (talk) 09:17, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Africa???

Very interesting that Africa where there are hundreds of nations in many countries yet only 4 are mentioned but Europe many are mentioned. DRC, Nigeria, Tanzania, Kenya, Ghana etc have many diff cultures Nlivataye (talk) 16:50, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree: this seems to be a big oversight. I have added the {{globalize}} tag to the article. QueenofBithynia (talk) 17:39, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Where is republic of Georgia?

Georgia have big history of multiciltural past, present and also future too. here living jews during 26 century. Here are azebaijanian, armenaians, russians, kurds, greeks and lot ofs nations.

188.169.219.163 (talk) 12:33, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Link to monmument of multiculturalism

add a link to the main article of the monument of multiculturism on the image text 2601:249:1101:3020:3DD3:227:42EC:49C0 (talk) 18:45, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]