Talk:Mru language

Bangladesh Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:

Add more images to Bangladesh Liberation War and related pages
Clean up Climate change in Bangladesh, it needs a lot of work
Clean up History of Bangladesh after independence, it needs NPOV
Improve Bangladesh back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengali language back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengalis and related pages
Take a look at the requested articles.
Make a MRT line 3 article.
Extend, add an infobox and a map of New Eskaton to New Eskaton.

Languages High‑importance

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

New language

This article mentions Rengmitca, is this a seperate language from Mru? I didn't see a Rengmitca Wikipedia page.Bluethailand (talk) 09:06, 20 May 2015 (UTC) http://chtjournal.com/culture/204/Rediscovery-of-Rengmitca-language-in-Bandarban[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mru language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:56, 7 February 2018 (UTC) ( Hi , help me to move page ..to Mro language.)Thanks.Moyezan (talk) 03:11, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

To not merge, given that the script is not used for the language, and hence the topics are distinct. Klbrain (talk) 08:17, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from Talk:Mro language § Merge proposal

I propose to merge Mru script into this article. Both articles are small, good sources for the script are very few, topics are closely related, amount of information on script is not too large to trigger WP:UNDUE. Викидим (talk) 04:49, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose They're very different topics. Short articles are not a problem.

Anyway, we wouldn't merge it here. This isn't the language that uses the script. — kwami (talk) 05:33, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for catching this. Викидим (talk) 05:47, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose They are different pages, and I doubt that short pages are much of a issue. ইজিয়ান (talk) 14:36, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.