User talk:Moyezan

May 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Mru people (Mrucha), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 04:46, 12 May 2020 (UTC) {{ hello, Thank you so much for welcome for edit }}Moyezan (talk) 04:51, 12 May 2020 (UTC) [[Hi, This is my talk page ,Please feel free to drop by and leave a message sometimMoyezan (talk) 09:52, 13 May 2020 (UTC)]][reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mro people (Ancient) (May 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.953.9644&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Mro people (Ancient) may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 09:17, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Moyezan! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 09:17, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mro/Awa Khami people

There appears to be a page-move war over the article currently at Awa Khami people (or wherever that redirects to by the time you read this). Discussing the best title on the article's talk page to reach consensus is normally a better solution than repeatedly moving a page. Certes (talk) 13:27, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I want like to discussion that Awa Khami people are take Mro name and confused with Mro people right now..before This title are Mro-Khami , now Mro this is very confused with Mro people. Mro people and Awa Khami people are all different .Help me please. Moyezan (talk) 03:00, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for joining the discussion at Talk:Mro people (Awa Khami)#Requested move 17 May 2020. I am not a subject expert and have no opinion on which is the better title for the article. Certes (talk) 11:31, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mro Mouth-Organ

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Mro Mouth-Organ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Glades12 (talk) 06:04, 18 May 2020 (UTC) (hi, ok .Thank you)Moyezan (talk) 06:22, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mru Mouth-Organ

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mru Mouth-Organ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://maisondesculturesdumonde.org/sites/default/files/albums/booklet260084.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. A a s i m 08:03, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mro(Mru) language

I see no evidence that it is call Mro(Mru) language. You need to discuss the move first. And provide sources that it is the Mro(Mru) language. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:11, 24 May 2020 (UTC) (Hi..Mro (Mru) language..here..Mro Mru Uni code.https://unicode.org/iso15924/iso15924-en.html Many Languages translation to Mro language..App https://aksharamukha.appspot.com/describe/Mro?fbclid=IwAR0UPTN2Nx4KfT0tLxLAGdPHrKjByB9_o74LWuQ1AO9mIPBwBp6XaFV-uGU Mro Keyboard font ...can see here..https://keymanweb.com/?_ga=2.244017925.1829076129.1590300131-764973306.1590300131&fbclid=IwAR11b3sLofihoh5K40FtlerecYdHwCh8fNkOM4-8qMcSEJuhjESqfn5 Moyezan (talk) 07:26, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Awa Khami language. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. Certes (talk) 15:05, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Mro people (Awa Khami) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Austronesier (talk) 05:53, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you move a page disruptively again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Austronesier (talk) 08:09, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. –Austronesier (talk) 10:19, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit reversion

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.S Philbrick (Talk) 12:26, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:21, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have indefinitely blocked you pending some kind of attempt to address the many issues brought to your talk page. Please read the messages on your talk page and make an unblock request that addresses them. Once you do that, I have no problem with another admin unblocking you. You may also wish to review the complaint made to administrators. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:25, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mro people (Ancient) (June 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Anasskoko were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mro people (Ancient) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mro people (Ancient), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

An@ss_koko^{(speak up)} 04:39, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, wikipedian Please given me editing from block.Moyezan (talk) 12:44, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mro people (Ancient)

Hello, Moyezan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mro people".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:10, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Allow to Edit

Please,allow to editing . Moyezan (talk) 20:19, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]