Talk:Morgenthaler (name)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthroponymy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the study of people's names on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthroponymyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthroponymyTemplate:WikiProject AnthroponymyAnthroponymy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Switzerland Low‑importance

	Switzerland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 28 May 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the pages at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 03:10, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Morgenthaler (name) → Morgenthaler
Morgenthaler → Morgenthaler (company)

– Seems quite WP:PROMOTIONal to have the company page at the base title here. The first ten pages of a GBooks search for "Morgenthaler" show no results for the company. The name seems like a better primary topic due to long-term significance. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 04:34, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nomination. Judging by the extensive collection of entries at Morgenthaler (name), there is certainly no WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 16:51, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. I don't see any other mononymous use of this name that challenges the company's claim to the primary topic, especially when the surname page is bathed in people who don't have an article or any kind of bluelink. Nohomersryan (talk) 19:13, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. This is a WP:TWODABS situation and of the two, the company is clearly the primary topic.[1] There's no reason to be biased against commercial enterprises as far as titling policy goes. Station1 (talk) 22:08, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.