Talk:Monster (Gabbie Hanna song)

Monster (Gabbie Hanna song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 20, 2019	Good article nominee	Not listed
August 5, 2019	Good article nominee	Listed

Current status: Good article

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Monster/Monster (Reborn)/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kyle Peake (talk · contribs) --Kyle Peake (talk) 04:53, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Infobox and lead

Infobox looks good
"October 26, 2018 simultaneously" → "October 26, 2018, simultaneously"
Not sure if encore should be wikilinked
"prominently features Hanna belting" → "prominently features Hanna belting a line"

It is not solely a line, and I think this suffices for the lead.

Mention the lyrical theme

It is mentioned: "The lyrics of "Monster" explore the theme of losing friends and self-analysis"

"was uploaded onto" → "was uploaded to"
"the same day of the singles' digital release" → "the same day as the single's digital release"
"It features her" → "The video features her"
"hinting at her suicide" → "hinting at Hanna's suicide"
Remove wikilink to suicide as this is definitely overlinking
"experienced minor success" → "experienced minor success"

Where is the change??

"on Billboard's" → "on the Billboard"
"In early December 2018" → "In December 2018"
"There, she performed" → "During her interview, the singer performed"

Background and composition

"released for digital download on" → "released for digital download in various countries on"
"song, featuring her" → "song, which includes her"
Should Carpool Karaoke be wikilinked actually?

Yes, indeed.

"that initially she had chosen" → "that she initially chose"
"During the lyrics, Hanna explores" → "Hanna uses the lyrics to explore"
Remove wikilink to imagery
"...that just doesn't work." remove speech marks as they are not needed since we know it's a quote from the style

Internet meme

"sounded not meshed."" → "sounded not meshed"." consistency
Remove WikiLink to YouTube

Music video

"was uploaded onto" → "was uploaded to"
"and was directed" → "which was directed"
"she takes out matches out" → "she takes matches out"
"as both make eye contact" → "as the two make eye contact"
"Hanna chases her" → "Hanna chases the girl"
"shots show the singer" → "shots show her"
"as well as her either" → "as well as either"
Remove wikilink on suicide, again

Track listing

Good

Charts

"Monster" Version → "Monster"

Release history

Territory → Country

External links

Remove this

References

Date formats need to be consistent
Cite various iTunes stores for refs 1 and 2 to verify that the releases were various
Ref 7 is unreliable per discussion; try to fix it with a reliable ref that reports the same content

The source may be unreliable, but we are not holding on to what's written there or something. The site shows the official video if Hanna giving the interview on the song, and this is definitely reliable.

Ref 8 shouldn't say Billboard in the title

Final comments and verdict

Decent work here, On hold for now. --Kyle Peake (talk) 08:18, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Though Cartoon network freak has gone on holiday, I will leave this on hold still as it would be unfair to fail it when there's not major issues as the user announced their holiday after my review. --Kyle Peake (talk) 08:03, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Kyle Peake: Thank you very much for the review. I have responded to the comments. Greetings; Cartoon network freak (talk) 18:35, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Will gladly ✓ Pass this now! --Kyle Peake (talk) 19:21, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 21 May 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved uncontroversial (non-admin closure) >>> Extorc.talk 15:35, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Monster and Monster (Reborn) → Monster (Gabbie Hanna song) – "Monster (Reborn)" is just the encore of "Monster". There is no reason that it needs to be a part of the title of the article. aaronneallucas (talk) 20:22, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.