Talk:Monhegan, Maine

Maine Low‑importance

	Maine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MaineWikipedia:WikiProject MaineTemplate:WikiProject MaineMaine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Islands

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject IslandsTemplate:WikiProject IslandsIslands articles

Education?

There is an empty section named Education. Not sure why it was there to start with. Unless somebody objects I will delete it.ElijahBosley ^{(talk ☞)} 19:59, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That section has helpfully been filled up with info. I note the info on how many pupils are there is from 2005, and it is now 2014. But hey, its a start.ElijahBosley ^{(talk ☞)} 22:18, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Elijah. I didn't find any reliable sources with newer info. Education websites suggest two students, as of 2011. Sincerely, User:HopsonRoad 22:20, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sears Gallagher

A good faith editor sought to include two images involving Mr. Sears Gallagher: one of him painting en plain air; the other his sketch of the Monhegan Village. I deleted Gallagher painting because the article is about Monhegan, not Mr. Gallagher. One might as well include a picture of a lobsterman lobstering. Come to think of it there are some nice ones. Though probably not available on Wikipeida Commons. If we need an image of an artist in the act of painting, there are other artists far more famous. I do applaud using art to illustrate the art colony, but let's not overdo it. If necessary we can do a List of Artists of Monhegan, or a List of Paintings of Mohegan.ElijahBosley ^{(talk ☞)} 20:45, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the intent of User:ElijahBosley. Certainly Gallagher does not deserve more billing than other artists of Mohegan. My aim in posting the picture was to depict an artist pursuing his/her discipline. The image of Gallagher is a dramatic photograph. I have dialed down the emphasis on Gallagher by captioning it, "Artist painting fisherman en plein air at Fish Beach. Photo by Warner Taylor." This illustrates what artists do to this day. I'll review my own images of artists on Monhegan and see if any are suitable for Commons. Sincerely, User:HopsonRoad 01:06, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Monhegan, Maine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:27, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Persistent addition of telephone exchange to infobox

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

One or more IP editors persistently adds the telephone exchange to the Area code entry in the Template:Infobox settlement, in a manner not supported by the template. I'm tired of reverting these edits and re-explaining that the template is not designed for that level of granularity and that telephone exchanges are not of encyclopedic interest. Is there some other way to handle this? The two IP numbers appear to be similar. Sincerely, HopsonRoad (talk) 17:35, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've protected the article. Hopefully the person will come here to discuss. 331dot (talk) 20:10, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]