Jump to content

Talk:Moi Delgado

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Moi (footballer))

Requested move 12 January 2021

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Pages moved to Moisés Delgado, Moisés Rodríguez and Moisés García per consensus on alternative proposal. – wbm1058 (talk) 23:57, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]



WP:COMMONNAME of former footballer is just "Moi", no WP:PRIMARYTOPIC so should be disambiguated further and Moi (footballer) should redirect to DAB at Moi. The latter footballer is exclusively known as "Moisés". Disambiguate to standard at WP:NCSP. Almost all references on respective pages confirm these as most used names for the footballers. Ortizesp (talk) 06:20, 12 January 2021 (UTC) Relisting. — Twassman [Talk·Contribs] 01:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)Relisting. Jerm (talk) 18:35, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 12:41, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Crouch, Swale: has not... GiantSnowman 09:07, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@GiantSnowman: I'm fine with either proposal its just that we shouldn't generally have partially disambiguated pages. Per the nom it seems that there are multiple footballers called "Moi" such as Moisés Rodríguez Laínez so this title is a PDAB even if Moisés Rodríguez Laínez can be naturally disambiguated. Its perfectly normal for when a proposal to involve 2 different issues (one disambiguation and the other common name) for someone to only have an opinion on one of them but not support or oppose the other so yes there is indeed clear consensus for you're alternative proposal. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:51, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.