Talk:Moab (disambiguation)

Requested move 30 January 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 16:11, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Moab (disambiguation) → Moab
Moab → Moab (ancient kingdom)

– The article currently at Moab is not a clear primary topic, Moab, Utah is just as well-known, if not more so. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 14:37, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Not it's not. Srnec (talk) 15:48, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose More hits for Moab in Utah than I expected through a brief google, but most still referred to the kingdom and the kingdom page receives over double the daily page views. CMD (talk) 11:19, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Google is different for everyone, but when I look it up in an incognito window, the top results are two vacation planning sites for Moab, UT, then Wikipedia's page on Moab, UT, then a bunch of images of Moab, UT, and then the Moab page. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 14:37, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Leaning oppose; the historical usage is primary by significance. BD2412 T 04:42, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No no no - long-term historical significance. WP:NWFCTM looms large here. Red Slash 22:40, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The ancient kingdom is primary (at this capitalisation) by page views and long-term significance. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:19, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.