Talk:Ministry of Education Language Centre
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]"If a student is not a citizen or permanent resident in Singapore, he or she can only take Malay courses."
- Really? I was almost ready to take German when I discovered the MOE FUBARed my high school application and sent me to RV instead of TCHS. Don't think I was a PR then. The ensuing red tape prevented me from getting a place in time. Then I remember some Chinese com
patriots(not PR either, I think) taking Japanese in the MOELC. -- Миборовский U|T|C|M|E|Chugoku Banzai! 23:04, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- Hmm, are you a citizen currently (out of curiosity?) I always wondered how someone with such an origin managed to acquire counterrevolutionary thought in the first place with such a firm foundation in youth (subconscious, you know) in the great trappings of the Gongchandang? :p Anyhow, I'm only quoting from the website, it might be possible because especially since a lot of expatriates are not PRs (although if they aren't planning to stay for more than a few years I don't see why they would bother to enroll them in the mainstream education system that would require a second language)....but I did say there were exceptions. What did you take? German, I assume?
- (Why do you hate HCI, by the way? I never really got it.) Elle vécut heureuse à jamais (Be eudaimonic!) 01:46, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
- Er, I'm a PR of Singapore. Really quite useless, we get none of the privileges and has to fulfill every single duty that citizens have... and more. (And I don't particularly like conscription, so yeah.) Anyway, what's that about the CPC? You do know that the first "C" stands for "Capitalist", right? And I wouldn't describe myself as an counterrevolutionary. Reactionary's more like it. Back to topic, I didn't actually take anything (due to the above-mentioned red tape) which is why I'm going "REALLY?" at that bit of info. -- Миборовский U|T|C|M|E|Chugoku Banzai! 00:29, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
- HCI? Because it SUCKS. OK I suppose you're expecting more than that: Because it ain't TCHS. -- Миборовский U|T|C|M|E|Chugoku Banzai! 00:29, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
1986
[edit]1986 is actually merely a rough guess of mine - it might be something like 1986, then something occurred in the 1990s...they showed us a documentary when I first came in (I arrived late because I couldn't find where they were meeting :D) which gave us a brief history of the MOELC....the "eight" regional language centres is a guess too, it might be five, or seven. :D I'll ring them up and confirm, although if Mib if you do remember, please aid me. Elle vécut heureuse à jamais (Be eudaimonic!) 01:46, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
- Nah. I've been there, what, twice? -- Миборовский U|T|C|M|E|Chugoku Banzai! 00:29, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
- You were only there twice? Pity. Elle vécut heureuse à jamais (Be eudaimonic!) 01:42, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
New Ghim Moh Campus
[edit]MOELC began operations at a 2nd campus at Ghim Moh (the former Ghim Moh Sec site I think?) oppo the temp Dunman Sec site this year (2007). Can anyone perhaps help to include it? (I don't think the info panel on the right can take 2 addresses...)Jinhua 08:03, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject class rating
[edit]This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 10:24, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Ministry of Education Singapore.jpg
[edit]Image:Ministry of Education Singapore.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 18:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Ministry of Education Language Centre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070309133704/http://www.moe.gov.sg/press/2007/pr20070307.htm to http://www.moe.gov.sg/press/2007/pr20070307.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090117123843/http://www.moelc.moe.edu.sg/rules/2009_MOELC%20Rules%20%26Regulations.pdf to http://www.moelc.moe.edu.sg/rules/2009_MOELC%20Rules%20%26Regulations.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:52, 21 October 2017 (UTC)