Talk:Military ranks of Brazil

Brazil High‑importance

	Brazil portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Culture / South America

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military culture, traditions, and heraldry task force
	South American military history task force

Marechal-do-Ar

Wouldn't Marshal of the Air Force be a better translation than Air Marshal? Greenshed 19:37, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would venture to say not. First, the UK does have the rank of Air Vice Marshal as a precedent in English language. Also, when the rank was created in Brazil, it seems that the idea was to designate that that rank was occupied by a marshal (in essence) whose job was the affairs of the air.SrAtoz (talk) 13:22, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FAB in 1822?

The Lead has the following sentence:

This article presents the insignia and ranks of the Brazilian military. These ranks were originally adopted upon Brazil's independence from Portugal in 1822.

Given that the Brazilian Air Force has a unique rank system, and does not use the Brazilian Army's system, I sincerely doubt the FAB was around in 1822. This sentence needs to be changed to be more clear. The date the FAB's ranks were implemented would be good to have, if someone has a reliable source for that. - BillCJ (talk) 12:31, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is a notable fact in Brazilian History that the Air Force was created in 1941. I will add the information citing a source.SrAtoz (talk) 13:26, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

One-star general?

The rankings appear to skip from colonel-level to two-star general. But on another page with the Brazil army's organization chart, there are one-star generals.jrn0074| 9:41, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

The epaulettes have two stars, but the rank is equivalent to an American one-star general. The rank that is skipped is the three-star general. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.42.21.187 (talk) 09:20, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Squadron" Admiral?

In the main page, the translation to "Almirante-de-esquadra" is shown as "Squadron Admiral". But a squadron is a limited set of warships that amount to just a fraction of a country's fleet. In contrast, the admiral in question holds the highest rank, and one of them is in fact the Navy's overall commander. At the same time, in strict Portuguese "esquadra" is a collective for ships, but it can also be used to mean the whole of the navy. I submit to you that "Almirante-de-esquadra" should be translated as its equivalent in other navies, "Fleet Admiral". Please mull this over. SrAtoz (talk) 01:11, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Military ranks of Brazil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070712135236/http://ommb.com.br/ to http://www.ommb.com.br/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:06, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]