Talk:Microquasar

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Astronomy Start‑class Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Logical inconsistency

This article contradicts itself by claiming that two different objects were the first microquasar to be discovered.

Towards the end of the first paragraph: The first microquasar SS 433, was discovered in 1979.

The third paragraph: Felix Mirabel, and Luis Rodriguez were awarded the Bruno Rossi Prize of the American Astronomical Society in 1997 for their discovery of the first microquasar, GRS 1915+105.

Which was discovered first, SS 433 or GRS 1915+105? This article is far from clear.PhysicsSean (talk) 13:00, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

After doing some research I've found that SS 433 was indeed the first microquasar to be discovered. F Mirabel and L Rodriguez were awarded the Bruno Rossi Prize in part for their discovery and subsequent discussion of the so-called superluminal emissions from sources such as GRS 1915+105.

I will update the article now to reflect this. I'll include the reputable sources through which I attained this information.PhysicsSean (talk) 13:17, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Accretion disk size

The article mentions the average size of a quasar accretion disk to be on the order of a billion square km. However, quick searches suggest that quasar accretion disks are much larger than this - on the order of light days in diameter (50+ billion km). E.g. https://academic.oup.com/pasj/article/70/5/97/5103885 https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/aac9bb https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/pdf/2007/05/aa6283-06.pdf

The milky way is reported to have an accretion disk 25 times larger than the solar system, although this may be using different definitions on the extent of the disk https://www.realclearscience.com/quick_and_clear_science/2019/06/06/the_milky_ways_supermassive_black_hole_has_an_accretion_disk_thats_25x_larger_than_the_solar_system.html
86.139.229.85 (talk) 14:08, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]