Talk:Micheldever railway station
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
First automobile journey
[edit]"First automobile journey" is not relevant to Micheldever railway station so I propose to move it to Micheldever. Biscuittin (talk) 20:29, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
- Done. Biscuittin (talk) 20:38, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
- @Biscuittin: Does the source say Micheldever, or Micheldever Station? If the latter (or some variant of that), it does belong in this article, because the station and village are something like three miles apart. I suspect that it was the station, because that is very close to what was then the main road from London to Exeter (now the A303). --Redrose64 (talk) 22:12, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
- According to the Micheldever article, "Micheldever Station" is the name of a village in Micheldever parish. Micheldever Station and Micheldever Railway Station are, therefore, two separate entities. Biscuittin (talk) 15:24, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
- The village of Micheldever Station takes its name from the railway station which it grew up around. It did not exist before the railway. --Redrose64 (talk) 16:05, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
- My own view is that "railway station" articles should confine themselves to information about the railway. I suppose "First automobile journey" is loosely connected to the railway because the car arrived at Micheldever by rail. If you want to move "First automobile journey" back here then I won't revert it. Biscuittin (talk) 08:09, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- @Biscuittin: There's a discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 May 31#Micheldever Station which may affect this. --Redrose64 (talk) 10:47, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
- My own view is that "railway station" articles should confine themselves to information about the railway. I suppose "First automobile journey" is loosely connected to the railway because the car arrived at Micheldever by rail. If you want to move "First automobile journey" back here then I won't revert it. Biscuittin (talk) 08:09, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- The village of Micheldever Station takes its name from the railway station which it grew up around. It did not exist before the railway. --Redrose64 (talk) 16:05, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
- According to the Micheldever article, "Micheldever Station" is the name of a village in Micheldever parish. Micheldever Station and Micheldever Railway Station are, therefore, two separate entities. Biscuittin (talk) 15:24, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
- @Biscuittin: Does the source say Micheldever, or Micheldever Station? If the latter (or some variant of that), it does belong in this article, because the station and village are something like three miles apart. I suspect that it was the station, because that is very close to what was then the main road from London to Exeter (now the A303). --Redrose64 (talk) 22:12, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Micheldever railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100820190450/http://home.btconnect.com:80/MERVYNS-COACHES/new_page_1.htm to http://home.btconnect.com/MERVYNS-COACHES/new_page_1.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:57, 18 January 2016 (UTC)