Talk:Metro Vancouver Regional District

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Metro Vancouver Regional District article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 1826 days

This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Canada: British Columbia / Vancouver / Governments / The 10,000 Challenge Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Vancouver (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Governments of Canada.
	This article was created or improved during The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada, which started in November 2016 and is ongoing. You can help!!

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Requested move 14 February 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. However, there is a consensus against moving the Greater Vancouver article. You can start a new RM at that article's talk page if you want. In the meantime, Metro Vancouver will continue to redirect to this article. Jenks24 (talk) 08:45, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Metro Vancouver → Metro Vancouver Regional District – As of 30 January 2017, the Greater Vancouver Regional District (GVRD) name was changed to Metro Vancouver Regional District (MVRD). Prior to this change, the name of the government body within the GVRD was called Metro Vancouver. Since the name of the government body did not reflect that of the regional district, the article title lacked Regional District from the name. This is no longer the case. Then there is the Greater Vancouver article. It was discussed that there should be two articles for this metropolitan area; one for the political entity and another for the geographical area. If this article is moved to Metro Vancouver Regional District; it would be best to move Greater Vancouver → Metro Vancouver. It's redundant to have two names for one metropolitan area, not to mention confusing. Northwest (talk) 14:17, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support move to Metro Vancouver Regional District, oppose moving Greater Vancouver. Make it clear one refers to the administrative entity while one refers to the geographic area. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:52, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Upon familiarizing with the article's subject today I support moving Metro Vancouver → Metro Vancouver Regional District. I oppose moving Greater Vancouver → Metro Vancouver as it should be a separate discussion in and of itself only if and when this requested move is successful. Until them I'm not in a position to support that, and my initial gut feel is that Metro Vancouver may need to become a dab page pointing to Metro Vancouver Regional District, Greater Vancouver and possibly other articles that I'm not yet familiar with. Hwy43 (talk) 05:59, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Metro Vancouver Regional District. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121224040331/http://public.metrovancouver.org/planning/development/strategy/RGSDocs/RGSAdoptedbyGVRDBoardJuly292011.pdf to http://public.metrovancouver.org/planning/development/strategy/RGSDocs/RGSAdoptedbyGVRDBoardJuly292011.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:56, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Port Coquitlam link

The map with the links to the websites of the constituent members is missing one for the City of Port Coquitlam. I'm not savvy enough to know how to add it.. DrivenJohnnie (talk) 15:25, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]