Talk:Merism

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Merism article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics Mid‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

merge

I don't know how to do the template thing, but this should be merged with merismus, which appears to be the same thing. Widsith 15:34, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would advise to keep the briefer explanation of merism at this alphabetical location -- someone seeking "merism" would probably not know to look up "merismus." JPickett

I'm unclear on the relationship between http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Hendiadys and Merism. Are they synonyms, one a subset of the other, or distinct? --Wcoole (talk) 21:14, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

They are very much distinct. A hendiadys is the breaking up of a composite expression into its two parts. Nikolaj1905 (talk) 09:16, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Even though neither of these authors uses the "pretext" language in this article, the "citation needed" in the last paragraph could be met by:

Peter Tiersma, Legal Language (University of Chicago Press, 1999). summarized at http://www.languageandlaw.org/LEGALLANG.HTM

which was cited with approval in Deborah Cao, Translating Law (Multilingual Matters, Ltd, 2007) at page 89

http://books.google.com/books?id=dA8Xns6_LUgC&pg=PA89&lpg=PA89&dq=grant+bargain+convey+french+english+saxon&source=bl&ots=9xTh3OCa0Z&sig=OaF8c_GUZqUQpe2jO1gOp1FREvs&hl=en&sa=X&ei=-UiET-qiJ8eW2gX82fD3CA&ved=0CFEQ6AEwCA#v=onepage&q=grant%20bargain%20convey%20french%20english%20saxon&f=false

Doug ---- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.54.145.254 (talk) 15:19, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]