Jump to content

Talk:Men in Black: International

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Film with crossover with Men on Back franchise; director tapped

[edit]

Here's the source. Npamusic (talk) 02:41, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request

[edit]

This edit messed up the article. It is too late to easily revert it and I don't have time to untangle it now myself so I'm pointing it out here and hopefully someone can undo the mess before it gets even worse. -- 109.76.144.21 (talk) 06:17, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No one else did anything to fix it, not even a little bit. Cleaned up the festering barf myself. -- 109.79.177.91 (talk) 16:30, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weird leg things coming from under my laminate floor like carpet

[edit]

They talk and have weird legs HELP 9819 69 ave NW 7802381739 2001:56A:F83E:C200:6E:B8E8:860C:9EE7 (talk) 17:17, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly invisible

[edit]

... Ari Hurstinen.... They Are! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:56A:F83E:C200:6E:B8E8:860C:9EE7 (talk) 17:19, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

T

[edit]

For some reason, the article constantly refers to T as "High T" even though they already said it once. This is basically the equivalent of repeatedly calling Ser Jaime Lannister from Game of Thrones by his full name or Ser Jaime. Just saying. HiGuys69420 (talk) 01:38, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Which Thompson?

[edit]

Gray was hired to direct, and Thompson joined the cast the following month. When both Tessa Thompson and Emma Thompson were in the cast, this is less than helpful. JH (talk page) 21:26, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nationality of production

[edit]

National databases disagree on country of production (not uncommon they all use different criteria for involvement) but US is in all of them. All the production companies credited are American which is also WP:STATUSQUO for the article. Usually national databases include countries that contribute financially at some level of cutoff which differs for each. Article should reflect where the film was actually created, not who contributed to financing it. Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:00, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Two different official terms

[edit]

Why is the movie classified as a spin-off on the it.wiki page, while here as a stand-alone sequel? Obviously the most important Wikipedia is the English one, but it's strange that two versions of the encyclopedia use different official terms. JacktheBrown (talk) 02:05, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]