Jump to content

Talk:Memories Off (video game)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Speedy Deletion

[edit]

I am currently working on this page and am doing each individual piece of information one at a time. Please hold, as I wish to also cover some of the other titles in the Memories Off series at the same time as this. Golden Saphir (talk) 16:50, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Incorporate information

[edit]

This article was redirected, but may contain information that could be incorporated here. G.A.S 17:08, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am wondering if the article on Memories Off Pure should be merged to this article. Alright so, Pure is originally released as an individual game, but apparently after the first release, the game has been included as a story arc in the latter versions of Memories Off (including the PSP version, which I personally do own), as well seeing that Official Another Story Clannad: On the Hillside Path that Light Watches Over, which was originally released as a separate book, has later been released with the 360 version of Clannad and does not has its own article (whatever I said nothing about Clannad), I am thinking maybe Pure should be merged here, instead of being kept as separate articles. -- クラウド668 06:10, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the merger, since most of the information that will pertain to the Pure article will be covered here anyway, and there's no need to have another Memories Off stub if we can help it. And, uh, the 360 version of Clannad only distributed the drama CDs of the Official Another Story over Xbox Live, unless I'm mistaken.-- 06:58, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Guess that was mistake on my part then :P. Anyways I guess I'll wait for a bit longer and see if anyone else would have anything to say. -- クラウド668 07:34, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment as of 2009-03-04

[edit]

Were there more reviews than that? Tezkag72私にどなる私のはかい 21:00, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree; the Reception section, as well as Development, should be fleshed out, and then it could probably be a B. More sources would be nice though, and if you look into expanding the Reception section, try to get rid of the RPGFan citations because we still haven't come to a concensus regarding the site. — Levi van Tine (tc) 09:04, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The only other review that I know of in existence is a Famitsu cross-review, which I can't really cite because I found it on 2ch. Usually visual novels do not receive any reviews, let alone reviews available online (GA Little Busters! do not have any reviews, but it has other stuff that covers that section). That said, I would love to get rid of RPGFan if I can, but if I really do take it out, then there really wouldn't be anything for a reception section.
On the other hand though, Famitsu.com do have a few sources that I can use for development, they however do not have any editorial content regarding reception. -- クラウド668 14:33, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Memories Off (visual novel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:55, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Memories Off (visual novel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:05, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]