Talk:Meja massacre
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Forces
[edit]This is a vague but nevertheless collective term which covers police, paramilitary and army units. As such, to refer to "Serb forces" for the FRY period in light of the known facts is no different to referring to English troops simply because we know the entity involved is the Yorkshire Regiment. It still goes down as British forces. For editors who use the all too common and sickening cliche to push their propaganda, "stick to sources", perhaps they too should stick to the more reliable sources of listing the country of which Serbia was a part. If they cannot familiarise themselves with these facts, they are wasting everybody's time here at WP because the community has no use for them. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 05:08, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
- Yes there are sources which use colloquial and non-encyclopedic term "Serb forces" when referring to the forces of FRY. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 08:33, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
- Howard Ball of VU: Stocchi is under no illusions that he can provide a complete accounting of Kosovo's dead. So far his team has recovered the remains of just a handful of the 500 men and boys pulled out of a convoy and massacred on April 27, 1999, by Serb police and paramilitaries near Meja.. Btw even the early reports that hadn't been based on thorough investigation made the distinction like HRW which attributes the massacre to "Serbian police and paramilitaries, as well as Yugoslav soldiers". --— ZjarriRrethues — talk 11:17, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
- This is absolutely fine. If we can keep everything this way on related articles then we can move away from this ongoing issue and never have to look back or discuss the obvious. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 17:17, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
- We will continue to have an "ongoing issue" as long as you try to rewrite history. Sources generally say "Serb". Our articles should reflect what independent sources say; you should stop inserting your own version of events. bobrayner (talk) 10:20, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
- @Bobrayner: I think that there are no "we" in this case. Everybody here agreed to make distinction between different armed units. Only you "will continue to have an "ongoing issue"".--Antidiskriminator (talk) 11:54, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
- And with regards my "inserting own version of events", if you want to play at denialism, start from the top - nominate Federal Republic of Yugoslavia for deletion on account of the fact that your bible does not recognise the entity, and see how far your "independent sources" support your nomintation. If you succeed, I will take time to help you dismantle every mentuon of FRY across Wikipedia and change it to Serb. Until then, kindly confine yourself to topics in which you comprehend the sources. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 14:22, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
- @Bobrayner: I think that there are no "we" in this case. Everybody here agreed to make distinction between different armed units. Only you "will continue to have an "ongoing issue"".--Antidiskriminator (talk) 11:54, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
- We will continue to have an "ongoing issue" as long as you try to rewrite history. Sources generally say "Serb". Our articles should reflect what independent sources say; you should stop inserting your own version of events. bobrayner (talk) 10:20, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
- This is absolutely fine. If we can keep everything this way on related articles then we can move away from this ongoing issue and never have to look back or discuss the obvious. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 17:17, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
- I strongly disagree. We should always rely on what the sources say. Synthesis is not allowed, and in this case sources specifically say Serb with VJ (i.e. Yugoslav) forces giving more of an assisting role. This is a critical element due to the way the command structure worked in Serbia and Yugoslavia, although the case could be made that Yugoslav forces were also more or less exclusively Serb whether in the individual low-level membeship or in the largely non-existing participation of Montenegro in the war effort. --Arianit (talk) 15:25, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
- If you disagree with the facts that is up to you, as for synthesis not being allowed - you've taken the words out of my mouth. army-Yugoslav, paramilitary-Serb. Forces? VAGUE. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 15:33, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
- I see where your confusion is. Force can also be police, not justy Army. --Arianit (talk) 15:45, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
- Not my confusion, everyone's! Forces can be anything, even fire fighters for that matter. Your latest revision is all right by me. I just reduced the load from the next line by merging the things. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 15:53, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
- I see where your confusion is. Force can also be police, not justy Army. --Arianit (talk) 15:45, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
- If you disagree with the facts that is up to you, as for synthesis not being allowed - you've taken the words out of my mouth. army-Yugoslav, paramilitary-Serb. Forces? VAGUE. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 15:33, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Meja massacre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20120906115449/http://www.pescanik.info/content/view/4742/62/ to http://www.pescanik.info/content/view/4742/62/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:25, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
The victims as a whole were not catholics.
[edit]The victims of the massacre of meja were not as a whole catholics therefore the information in the infobox stating that the targets were catholic albanians is simply wrong and i challenge anyone here to proof me wrong. Infact, the majority of the victims were regular albanian muslims, who were temporarly staying in Meja because they were on route to Albania, fleeing from their villages.
• A look at the grave and thumbstones suggests the following, the catholic victims have a cross on their thumbstone, while non-catholics have the albanian double headed-eagle symbol on it. Those with the cross are the minority of the graves there. • An arab documentary team visited meja and remaining family members in 2006, they also mention at the minute 33:10 that the majority of the victims were, like the majority of the puplation in kosovo, non-catholics, meaning muslims. Link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QkJkRLRJ_IU&rco=1
• The inhabitants of the village told the court that refugees from 17 other regions had gathered in Meja.
"Martin Pnishi, a farmer from Meja, testified about the massacre at a trial at the ICTY in 2006. From the window of his house, he said he could see large number of Kosovo Albanians coming towards Meja after fleeing their homes, as the village was on the way to the Albanian border, where they were headed to seek safety. “In this convoy, there were people from 17 villages,” he told the Hague court." Source: https://balkaninsight.com/2020/04/27/massacre-in-meja-evidence-of-serbian-officers-involvement-ignored/ or https://www.icty.org/x/cases/djordjevic/trans/en/090629IT.htm Page 6552.
• My last and most meaningful objetive source will be a court ruling by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia against serbian militia men that were persecuted for the involvements in the war crimes in Meja. At page 402 and 403 the names of the victims are listened and it is clearly recogniseable that only around 30% have catholic albanian names, while the rest have non-catholic names, i.e muslim albanian names. Link: https://www.icty.org/x/cases/djordjevic/tjug/en/110223_djordjevic_judgt_en.pdf
Furthermore, the source that is right now being linked to the "the targets were catholic albanians" statement does not at any time make the claim that these victims were catholics. Actually it says "... ethnic Albanian men between the ages of 16 and 60...". The catholic term was fabricated here on this article. Please see for yourself. Link: https://www.refworld.org/reference/annualreport/usdos/2000/en/91574 KazaziShkodra (talk) 16:47, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Your first two "sources" are not relevant whatsoever because the first one is overgeneralization based on a visual observation and not based on facts, so its a worthless assumption. For the second one it's the same case, the creator of the documentary provides no source for his claim that "there were mose Muslim graves", which wouldnt track with the report that you mentioned in the third point which says that "The Kosovo Albanian inhabitants in that area were predominantly Catholic." (page 382) As for the third claim, thats an assumption AGAIN because people can convert to Christianity while having non-Christian names, which is probably the case. Albaniandemocraticnolist (talk) 14:21, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Dear Albaniandemocraticnolist,
- If the two sources I cite at the beginning are irrelevant in your view, I would like to see sources from you that clearly state that all or most of the massacre victims were Catholic. There is not a single one, only that the village of Meja is Catholic. Which is misleading, because anyone who has studied the massacre knows that Meja was a gathering point for refugees from MANY OTHER REGIONS. Which unfortunately were victims of the massacre. How many times is it necessary to emphasize this point?
- Well, in your opinion, it is an assumption to determine religion by name. This is only said by someone who does not know the zeitgeist of the Albanian population in ex-Yugoslav countries. Religious names were the norm until 1970, and for many it still is today. Keep in mind, that many victims were born before 1970, as said in the article. Finally, your explanation that they are converts to Catholicism who still had their old Muslim names is very far-fetched. That is really nothing more than one and the only assertion here. I can't believe that you suggest something like that. KazaziShkodra (talk) 22:21, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- I literally did, you are ignoring the report that you yourself cited. In page 382 of this report, it says that "The Kosovo Albanian inhabitants in that area were predominantly Catholic." I am citing this report because it is the only relevant one, your point about the names is wholly irrelevant because as i said that has no bearing on their faith. Purely subjective response debunked by your own citation. Albaniandemocraticnolist (talk) 09:40, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Meant to cite this https://www.icty.org/x/cases/djordjevic/tjug/en/110223_djordjevic_judgt_en.pdf. Albaniandemocraticnolist (talk) 09:45, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Notice how you in a very impudent manner try to ignore that many refugees from other gathered in Meja. Refugees from other regions that are not predominantly Catholic
- "Martin Pnishi, a farmer from Meja, testified about the massacre at a trial at the ICTY in 2006. From the window of his house, he said he could see large number of Kosovo Albanians coming towards Meja after fleeing their homes, as the village was on the way to the Albanian border, where they were headed to seek safety. “In this convoy, there were people from 17 villages,” he told the Hague court."
- Source: https://balkaninsight.com/2020/04/27/massacre-in-meja-evidence-of-serbian-officers-involvement-ignored/ or https://www.icty.org/x/cases/djordjevic/trans/en/090629IT.htm Page 6552.
- The "original" inhabitants, of course, remain predominantly Catholic. I think that is not hard to understand, unless you don't want to for whatever reason. KazaziShkodra (talk) 15:05, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- The report was written for the time of the massacre. What you're saying is not proof whatsoever, as no religious demographics are given for the people from the other villages, we dont even know how many people from other villages took refuge in Meja. Albaniandemocraticnolist (talk) 11:41, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- That the refugees from the other villages are not also Catholic is a pretty ridiculous thesis. Catholic Albanians are a 2-3% minority in Kosovo, who reside either in remote villages like Meja or in the city. Meja in Gjakova is just on the route to Albania, the final destenation point of those refugees.
- Please refrain from editing the article again until you have clear written proof that the majority of the victims of the massacre were Catholics. KazaziShkodra (talk) 18:21, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- The burden of proof lies with those making assertions about the victims’ religious affiliations without evidence. The established demographic context supports the claim that a majority of the victims in Meja were Catholic.
- Also, you mentioned that Catholic Albanians represent a 2-3% minority in Kosovo, this statistic does not reflect the religious composition of the local population in Meja at the time of the massacre. Localized demographics can differ significantly from national statistics. Albaniandemocraticnolist (talk) 11:43, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- You claim: "The established demographic context supports the assertion that the majority of the victims in Meja were Catholic". How exactly is this the case? Nowhere is this claim made, you make it up AND you can't logically prove it. The document I provided simply states that Meja was a town inhabited by Catholic Albanians. Note that you are now basing your claim on the document I provided, ironically the Wikipedia article has long claimed that the victims were Catholic, without any source to back it up. So you are now using the document I provided, which clearly shows that the majority of the victims were not Catholics, simply because only a minority of them have Christian names. I find this ironic and dishonest.
- I am gonna repeat myself now, but that's not an issue for me, because by claiming that these muslim victims were catholic, you mock these victims and their family members, some of whom I know personally. And I take responsibility for them.
- If you had studied the massacre, you would have understood that a large proportion of the victims were men taken from the refugee convoys in Meja. These families had left the villages of Gjakova and Junik in the morning of that day and had been forced by the JNA to go to Albania. Here is a quote from Human Rights Watch:
- "Human Rights Watch first learned of the massacre on the early morning of April 28, as traumatized refugees were entering Albania from the Morina border crossing near Kukes, Albania.51 Tractors were pulling wagons carrying only women, children, and elderly men who reported how Serbian and Yugoslav forces had expelled them from their villages around Djakovica on April 27 and forced them into a convoy that went through Meja and then towards the Morina border crossing. In Meja, they said, the police and paramilitary forces robbed most of the Albanians, took many of the men off the tractors and wagons, and forced the convoy to continue. Later in the day, refugees entering Albania reported seeing men lined up along the road in Meja. By evening, and over the next days, refugees claimed that they had seen large numbers of dead bodies along the road in the village."
- AND
- "According to all of the witnesses, in the early morning of April 27 Serbian special police and paramilitary units, together with soldiers of the Yugoslav Army, systematically evicted all ethnic Albanians from the villages between Djakovica and Junik-the region near the Albanian border known in Albanian as Reka e Keq. Beginning around 6 a.m., the security forces forcibly expelled residents from the following villages: Pacaj (Pecaj), Nivokaz, Dobras (Dobrash), Seremet (Sheremet), Jahoc, Ponasevac (Ponashec), Racaj (Rracaj), Ramoc, Madanaj, and Orize. All of the witnesses interviewed from these villages, including people from other areas who had sought refuge there over the previous month, told Human Rights Watch that soldiers and special police forces surrounded their villages, rounded up the inhabitants, and forced them to flee along the road towards Djakovica, some in wagons drawn by tractors and some on foot. Many of the villages were then systematically burned. One eighteen-year-old woman from Dobras told Human Rights Watch:" https://www.hrw.org/reports/2001/kosovo/undword-06.htm
- Now, in these villages catholics are only few. In Junik, according to Wikepdia, there is 1% catholics.
- I would now like to take another brief look at the names and whether one can judge from the names whether the victims were Catholic or Muslim.
- 3 known witnesses in the Meja trial Lush Krasniqi, Martin Pnishi, Lizane Malaj. All three Catholics, the first from Ramoc (so not from Meja, do you notice?), the others from Meja. All of them have Catholic first names and confess to being Catholic in court.
- I have an idea, why don't you take a witness of what happened and show him to us, who has a Muslim name but claims to be Catholic? Muslim names would be Fadil, Ramiz, Ymeri, Xhafer, for example. Names you can find plenty of in the document i provided that lists the name of the victims of the massacre. I'm really curious about that.
- And please don't use double standards if it's not enough to be Muslim despite having a Muslim name. Then that must also apply to Catholic names. KazaziShkodra (talk) 11:39, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- You are literally going to every other topic except for the one that we are discussing. The report is clearly talking about the time when the massacre occured, or else they would've stated that the demographics shifted significantly (which the report never even alluded to). Albaniandemocraticnolist (talk) 17:24, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- laughable. you know what you are doing. and you don't mind walking over dead bodies, in the truest sense of the word. KazaziShkodra (talk) 18:36, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- You are literally going to every other topic except for the one that we are discussing. The report is clearly talking about the time when the massacre occured, or else they would've stated that the demographics shifted significantly (which the report never even alluded to). Albaniandemocraticnolist (talk) 17:24, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- The report was written for the time of the massacre. What you're saying is not proof whatsoever, as no religious demographics are given for the people from the other villages, we dont even know how many people from other villages took refuge in Meja. Albaniandemocraticnolist (talk) 11:41, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- I literally did, you are ignoring the report that you yourself cited. In page 382 of this report, it says that "The Kosovo Albanian inhabitants in that area were predominantly Catholic." I am citing this report because it is the only relevant one, your point about the names is wholly irrelevant because as i said that has no bearing on their faith. Purely subjective response debunked by your own citation. Albaniandemocraticnolist (talk) 09:40, 5 October 2024 (UTC)